POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Congressional Hearing on the Flint Water Crisis

Original title: EXAMINING FEDERAL ADMINISTRATION OF THE SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT IN FLINT, MICHIGAN

January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing established the formal congressional record regarding federal and state oversight failures that led to lead contamination in Flint's public water supply, impacting the health and safety of thousands of residents.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Flint Residents

Residents experienced lead contamination in their public water supply, which was the subject of the oversight investigation.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

The agency's regulatory actions and oversight of the Safe Drinking Water Act were under formal review by Congress.

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

The state department's management of water safety in Flint was a primary focus of the committee's inquiry.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is the official transcript of a February 3, 2016, House Oversight Committee hearing regarding the federal government's role in the Flint, Michigan water contamination crisis. The hearing examined the administration of the and included testimony from EPA officials, state environmental regulators, academic experts, and Flint residents.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on February 3, 2016, by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
  • The primary subject was the federal administration of the Safe Drinking Water Act in Flint, Michigan.
  • Witnesses included representatives from the EPA, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, academic researchers, and a Flint resident.
  • The committee entered several internal EPA memos and emails into the record regarding the timeline of the water crisis.
  • Democratic members of the committee formally requested that Michigan Governor Rick Snyder appear as a witness.

Why It Matters

The hearing established the formal congressional record regarding federal and state oversight failures that led to lead contamination in Flint's public water supply, impacting the health and safety of thousands of residents.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
To investigate how the federal government and the EPA managed the during the water contamination crisis in Flint, Michigan.
Who testified at the hearing?
Testimony was provided by U.S. Representative Dan Kildee, EPA official Joel Beauvais, Michigan DEQ Director Keith Creagh, Professor Marc Edwards, and Flint resident LeeAnne Walters.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 2 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Congressional Oversight of EPA

The hearing highlights a significant moment where congressional oversight was used to challenge EPA enforcement protocols regarding lead in water.

Connected Entities

personKeith CreaghDirector, Michigan Department of Environmental QualityMap →
personJoel BeauvaisActing Deputy Assistant Administrator, EPA Office of WaterMap →
personElijah E. CummingsRanking Minority Member of the CommitteeMap →
organizationEnvironmental Protection AgencyFederal agency responsible for enforcing the Safe Drinking Water ActMap →
personLeeAnne WaltersFlint resident and witnessMap →
personMarc EdwardsProfessor at Virginia Tech, expert witnessMap →
personDan KildeeU.S. Representative from MichiganMap →
personJason ChaffetzChairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance95
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy85
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment40
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record