The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.North Carolina Bans PFAS Manufacture and Distribution, Requires Water Testing and Cleanup Grants
Last action · April 10, 2025: Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House (House action)Sponsors: Pricey Harrison and 19 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
North Carolina bans the knowing manufacture, use, and distribution of chemicals across the state, establishes civil penalties for violations, and requires public water systems and industrial dischargers to disclose pollutant levels. The bill also appropriates $92.2 million in total state funds for drinking water cleanup, monitoring, and agency studies.
Residents and local businesses face new chemical restrictions, while public water systems and industrial facilities must meet stricter discharge disclosure rules and zero-discharge standards for and 1,4-dioxane. At the same time, the measure provides millions of dollars in grants and funds to upgrade water treatment systems and test private wells contaminated above specific state thresholds.
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Public water systems
Water systems must provide customer notifications within 30 days of receiving sampling results, comply with new permit disclosure requirements, and are eligible for infrastructure grants.
Industrial users discharging wastewater
Industrial users must fully disclose pollutants in permit applications and eliminate PFAS and 1,4-dioxane from their discharges if required by permittees.
State environmental and health agencies
Agencies such as the Department of Environmental Quality and DHHS are assigned specific research, inventory creation, rulemaking, and reporting mandates backed by state appropriations.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the bill do regarding the manufacture of PFAS?
What financial assistance is available for private wells contaminated with PFAS?
What are the public notification requirements for water systems that find PFAS?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.
Procedural history
3 actions- Apr 10, 2025HouseRef To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
- Apr 10, 2025HousePassed 1st Reading
- Apr 9, 2025HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 15 more sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Comprehensive State-Level Chemical Ban
The legislation shifts state environmental policy from monitoring and remediation toward a direct statutory prohibition on the manufacture and distribution of PFAS classes.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.ncleg.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance90How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy75Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz65Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools