Water Management Districts Oversight and Funding Bill
June 16, 2025
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The bill would have changed how water management districts manage their budgets, report on Everglades restoration progress, and procure large-scale construction projects, while also dictating how state funds are allocated for flood resilience and environmental infrastructure.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Water Management Districts
Districts face new budget reporting requirements, procurement rules, and restrictions on the use of state funds.
Lobbyists
Lobbyists are prohibited from making expenditures to district officials and face potential ethics investigations.
Property Taxpayers
Taxpayers in districts or basins could be subject to new referenda for ad valorem taxes to fund capital improvement projects.
Last recorded activity June 16, 2025.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens to the bill?
How would this have affected water management district taxes?
What are the new lobbying rules?
Why It Matters
The bill would have changed how water management districts manage their budgets, report on Everglades restoration progress, and procure large-scale construction projects, while also dictating how state funds are allocated for flood resilience and environmental infrastructure.
News Coverage
Lobbying Activity
PACIFIC ATLANTIC PARTNERS
on behalf of WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
MABRY PUBLIC AFFAIRS LLC
on behalf of HIDALGO COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 1
SIERRA PACIFIC STRATEGIES
on behalf of KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Voting Record
Passage, Third Reading
Total
118
Yes
92
No
20
Present
0
Not Voting
6
Abstain
0
How they voted (118)
Mike Gottlieb
Democratic · no
Tae Edmonds
Democratic · yes
Dana Trabulsy
Republican · yes
Jon Albert
Republican · yes
Kim Kendall
Republican · yes
Bill Conerly
Republican · yes
Yvonne Hinson
Democratic · yes
Marie Woodson
Democratic · no
Mike Giallombardo
Republican · yes
Alex Andrade
Republican · yes
Chad Johnson
Republican · yes
Jeff Holcomb
Republican · yes
Erika Booth
Republican · yes
Toby Overdorf
Republican · yes
Ryan Chamberlin
Republican · yes
Tiffany Esposito
Republican · yes
Bill Partington
Republican · yes
Vicki Lopez
Republican · yes
Dianne Hart-Lowman
Democratic · no
Ashley Gantt
Democratic · no
Alex Rizo
Republican · yes
Webster Barnaby
Republican · yes
Traci Koster
Republican · yes
Wallace Aristide
Democratic · yes
+ 94 more
Third Reading
Total
38
Yes
37
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (38)
Darryl Rouson
Democratic · yes
Erin Grall
Republican · yes
Bryan Ávila
Republican · yes
Lori Berman
Democratic · yes
Kristen Arrington
Democratic · yes
Blaise Ingoglia
- · yes
Nick DiCeglie
Republican · yes
Mack Bernard
Democratic · yes
Corey Simon
Republican · yes
Keith Truenow
Republican · yes
Tommy Wright
Republican · yes
Don Gaetz
Republican · yes
Danny Burgess
Republican · yes
Jonathan Martin
Republican · yes
Stan McClain
Republican · yes
Ed Hooper
Republican · yes
Gayle Harrell
Republican · yes
Jay Trumbull
Republican · yes
Ben Albritton
Republican · yes
Jay Collins
- · yes
Tracie Davis
Democratic · yes
Colleen Burton
Republican · yes
Tom Leek
Republican · yes
Clay Yarborough
Republican · yes
+ 14 more
Favorable with Committee Substitute
Total
18
Yes
18
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (18)
Nick DiCeglie
Republican · yes
Jonathan Martin
Republican · yes
Darryl Rouson
Democratic · yes
Tommy Wright
Republican · yes
Jason Brodeur
Republican · yes
Jason Pizzo
Independent · yes
Danny Burgess
Republican · yes
Lori Berman
Democratic · yes
Ileana Garcia
Republican · yes
Tina Polsky
Democratic · yes
Jay Trumbull
Republican · yes
Gayle Harrell
Republican · yes
Jay Collins
- · yes
Carlos Smith
Democratic · yes
Erin Grall
Republican · yes
Ed Hooper
Republican · yes
Stan McClain
Republican · yes
Barbara Sharief
Democratic · yes
Favorable
Total
11
Yes
11
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (11)
Lori Berman
Democratic · yes
Jay Collins
- · yes
Keith Truenow
Republican · yes
Kristen Arrington
Democratic · yes
Colleen Burton
Republican · yes
Jason Brodeur
Republican · yes
Jason Pizzo
Independent · yes
Barbara Sharief
Democratic · yes
Stan McClain
Republican · yes
Erin Grall
Republican · yes
Nick DiCeglie
Republican · yes
Submitted and Reported Favorably as Committee Bill
Total
7
Yes
7
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Increased Legislative Oversight
The bill represents a significant move toward centralizing legislative control over water management district budgets and procurement processes.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools