The 30-second read · every claim links to its source
Votes with the Democratic majority 92% of the time; Edmonds’s 8 recent breaks lean one way - voting yes where most Democrats voted no. official roll calls
Advocacy groups split on the record - Americans for Prosperity - Florida scores it 78.57, Florida Chamber of Commerce 71% (2 published scorecards). published scorecards
Sponsored 8 bills and co-sponsored 13 on record; most recently HB 4035 “Palm Beach County” (Jul 1, 2026). bill records
What we don’t cover yet 1 gaps
What we don’t cover yet
Campaign finance filings for this office aren’t wired in yet - when they’re sourced, they’ll appear here.
The record
official roll calls · every vote links to the bill
92%
Votes with the Democratic majority.
Where both parties recorded a position on the same roll call, Edmonds’s vote matched the Democratic position 92% of the time. That makes the 8 recent breaks the clearest signal of where Edmonds actually stands - they’re first, below. official roll calls · Jun 2, 2026
1,497 votes · 848 yes · 276 absent · 250 not voting · 123 no
Where Edmonds broke from the party - the high-signal votes
VOTED YES
Foreign Influence
Democrats voted no, 6–17; Edmonds was one of the 6 in favor · HB 905 · Mar 13, 2026
roll call
VOTED YES
School Safety
Democrats voted no, 8–20; Edmonds was one of the 8 in favor · HB 757 · Mar 12, 2026
roll call
VOTED YES
Local Government Finances
Democrats voted no, 8–18; Edmonds was one of the 8 in favor · HB 1329 · Mar 12, 2026
roll call
Pattern: the breaks lean one way - voting yes where most Democrats voted no.
Votes by topic: top topics first, the rest behind filters
conference committee16 votes · yes on 0, no on 0, 16 other
state budget12 votes · yes on 0, no on 0, 12 other
Transportation11 votes · yes on 6, no on 4, 1 other
Criminal Justice7 votes · yes on 4, no on 0, 3 other
State Government7 votes · yes on 3, no on 4
One vote can touch several topics.
LATEST: NOT VOTINGSave our Homes from Excessive Property TaxesHJR 1F · Jun 2, 2026CommitteesRanking Member · Health Professions & Programs SubcommitteeEconomic Infrastructure SubcommitteeEducation & Employment CommitteePreK-12 Budget Subcommittee
2 ratings from advocacy groups, across 2 issue areas. Scores are shown on a shared 0–100 scale so groups can be read side by side, with each group’s own published score kept next to it. Every score is the group’s opinion, never our verdict, and every row links to the scorecard.
Taxes & Economy · 1
Americans for Prosperity - Floridaconservative · 2025
third-party academic estimates - never our verdict
Left–right estimates (academic)
Shor-McCarty · votesVery Liberal
D
R
LeftRight
More liberal than 96% of Florida House members
Details
Score−1.52 on a −2.5 to +2.5 scale
BasisFrom roll-call votes
Party median0.41 more liberal than the Democratic median in this group (−1.11)
Compared with604 members of Florida House members (1996–2022)
Covers2022
● This person Democrats (244) Republicans (360)Thick bar: middle half · thin line: middle 80%
Shor, Boris. 2025. "Individual State Legislator Shor-McCarty Ideology Data, January 2025 Update." Harvard Dataverse, V1. Method: Shor, Boris, and Nolan McCarty. 2011. "The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures." American Political Science Review 105(3). Shor-McCarty ↗
DIME CFscore · donorsLiberal
D
R
I
LeftRight
More liberal than 63% of 2022 Florida House candidates
Details
Score−0.60 on a −2.5 to +2.5 scale
BasisFrom campaign donors
Party median0.31 more conservative than the Democratic median in this group (−0.92)
Compared with311 members of 2022 Florida House candidates
Covers2022
● This person Democrats (131) Republicans (175) Independents (5)Thick bar: middle half · thin line: middle 80%
Bonica, Adam. 2024. Database on Ideology, Money in Politics, and Elections: Public version 4.0. Stanford University Libraries. https://data.stanford.edu/dime DIME CFscore ↗
About these scores
These are third-party academic estimates of one left–right dimension, computed by researchers from roll-call votes or campaign donors. They are not Poliscope’s judgment. Each source uses its own scale, so compare people within a source rather than across sources.
