The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Utah regulates sensitive materials in public school libraries and establishes review processes
Last action · March 6, 2026: House/ filedSponsor: Ken Ivory
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
This bill enacts provisions related to sensitive materials in a public school.
School districts and charter schools must immediately remove materials determined to be objectively sensitive upon a plausible claim, and statewide removal is triggered if a threshold number of LEAs determine a material is objectively sensitive.
- The State Board of Education oversees public education policy and administration across Utah school districts and charter schools. context
- Utah legislative sessions frequently address curriculum standards, parental rights, and the regulation of reading materials and instructional resources in public schools. context
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
public school students
Students are restricted from accessing sensitive instructional materials and school library collections that contain prohibited content.
parents
Parents gain the ability to initiate sensitive material reviews, give consent for certain course materials, and participate in subjective sensitive material evaluations.
LEA governing boards
Boards must adopt school library policies, vote on review appeals in public meetings, and ensure compliance with removal mandates.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who can initiate a review of instructional materials in a school?
What happens when an instructional material is determined to be objectively sensitive?
Can a statewide removal requirement be overturned?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Bias ratings based on AllSides / Media Bias/Fact Check
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.
Procedural history
14 actions- Mar 6, 2026HouseHouse/ filed
- Mar 6, 2026HouseHouse/ strike enacting clause
- Mar 5, 2026HouseHouse/ comm rpt/ sent to Rules
- Mar 4, 2026HouseHouse Comm - Recommends Returned to Rules
- Feb 13, 2026HouseCommitteeHouse/ to standing committee
- Feb 11, 2026HouseHouse/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
Show 8 earlier actions
- Feb 11, 2026ReleasedLFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0517
- Feb 11, 2026Version SponsorLFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0517
- Feb 9, 2026HouseIntroducedHouse/ 1st reading (Introduced)
- Feb 9, 2026HouseHouse/ received bill from Legislative Research
- Feb 9, 2026Legislative Fiscal AgencyLFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0517
- Feb 9, 2026Legislative Fiscal AnalystLFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0517
- Feb 9, 2026Legislative Research and General CounselNumbered Bill Publicly Distributed
- Feb 9, 2026Legislative Research and General CounselBill Numbered but not Distributed
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Statewide Material Removal Threshold
The bill introduces a mechanism where local determinations by a specific number of LEAs automatically mandate statewide removal of an instructional material, subject to state board override.
Connected Entities
Sources
le.utah.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 85)
- Controversy80Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment15Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz70Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools