POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Utah HB 151 Exempts Concurrent Enrollment, Advanced Placement, and International Baccalaureate Courses from Sensitive Material Restrictions with Parental Consent

Original title: Teaching Materials Amendments

Last action · March 6, 2026: House/ filedSponsor: Carol Moss

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

This bill exempts certain courses from requirements regarding the instructional material for those courses.

Why it matters

Students enrolled in advanced or specialized high school courses may access specific instructional materials previously restricted as sensitive, provided their parents actively consent after receiving advance notice.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

students

Students enrolled in advanced placement, concurrent enrollment, international baccalaureate, medical, or family and consumer science courses may access instructional materials when parental consent is provided.

Directly affected

parents

Parents receive advance notice of sensitive instructional materials in specific advanced courses and must provide consent by enrolling their child.

Directly affected

local education agencies

Local education agencies must process allegations, remove challenged materials under specific timelines, conduct objective and subjective reviews, and report determinations to the state board.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which courses are exempt from sensitive material restrictions under this bill?
Concurrent enrollment courses, Advanced Placement courses, International Baccalaureate courses with parent notice and consent, medical courses, family and consumer science courses, and courses exempted by state board rule are excluded from sensitive material definitions.
How many unsuccessful challenges can an individual make before losing the ability to trigger a review?
An individual cannot trigger a sensitive material review for the remainder of an academic year after making three unsuccessful challenges during that same year.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.

Procedural history

11 actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ filed
  2. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ strike enacting clause
  3. Jan 20, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  4. Jan 20, 2026House
    House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  5. Jan 16, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0151
  6. Jan 16, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0151
Show 5 earlier actions
  1. Jan 14, 2026House
    House/ received bill from Legislative Research
  2. Jan 6, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0151
  3. Jan 6, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0151
  4. Jan 6, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  5. Jan 6, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Exemption for Advanced and Specialized Courses

The bill creates specific carve-outs from school sensitive material prohibitions for AP, IB, concurrent enrollment, medical, and family and consumer science courses when parental notice and consent are met.

Connected Entities

Office of the Attorney General, Education Interim Committee, Office of the Legislative Auditor General and 3 more
OrganizationOffice of the Attorney General“Consults with the state board to provide guidance and training”Map →
OrganizationEducation Interim Committee“Receives annual reports on implementation, compliance, and audits”Map →
OrganizationOffice of the Legislative Auditor General“Required to conduct audits of school district compliance”Map →
PersonCarol S. Moss“Chief Sponsor of HB 151 in the Utah House of Representatives”Map →
OrganizationUtah Schools for the Deaf and the Blind“Public school entity subject to instructional material regulations”Map →
OrganizationState Risk Management Fund“Provides coverage for indemnified personnel acting under the statute”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record