POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Kansas Bill Exempts Court and Judicial Branch Employees Providing Standard Forms from Unauthorized Practice of Law Rules

Original title: AN ACT concerning the Kansas consumer protection act; relating to the unauthorized practice of law; providing for an exception thereto for an employee of the judicial branch or a district court providing a standard form to a member of the public; amending K.S.A. 50-6,142 and repealing the existing section.

Last action · April 10, 2026: Died in Committee

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

AN ACT concerning the Kansas consumer protection act; relating to the unauthorized practice of law; providing for an exception thereto for an employee of the judicial branch or a district court providing a standard form to a member of the public; amending K.S.A. 50-6,142 and repealing the existing section.

Why it matters

Judicial branch and court staff gain explicit legal protection from consumer protection penalties and claims when distributing court-approved standard forms to residents.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Employees of the judicial branch or a district court

They receive an explicit exemption from unauthorized practice of law violations and liability when providing approved standard forms to the public.

Directly affected

Members of the public

They receive standard forms from court and judicial branch employees and enter information onto those forms.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does a court employee face liability if a member of the public fills out a standard form incorrectly?
No. Under the bill, an employee may rely on the assumption that the information provided by the member of the public is accurate, and the employee is not responsible for any incorrect information entered by the public onto the form.
Which entities are authorized to approve standard forms for the purposes of this exemption?
Standard forms may be approved by the Kansas supreme court, the office of judicial administration, the judicial council, or a judicial district.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Apr 10, 2026Senate
    Died in Committee
  2. Jan 28, 2026SenateCommittee
    Referred to Senate Committee on Judiciary
  3. Jan 27, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Connected Entities

office of judicial administration, Kansas, 50-6,142 and 3 more
Organizationoffice of judicial administration“Approves standard forms”Map →
locationKansas“State where the consumer protection act and court rules apply”Map →
other50-6,142“Kansas statute amended and repealed by the bill”Map →
Organizationjudicial council“Approves standard forms”Map →
otherKansas consumer protection act“Statutory act amended by the bill”Map →
OrganizationKansas supreme court“Authorizes practice of law and approves standard forms”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.kslegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 25)
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record