POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Proposal for the U.S. to Join the International Criminal Court

Original title: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States should ratify the Rome Statute and join the International Criminal Court.

Last action · July 15, 2026: Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.Sponsors: Ilhan Omar and 5 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

This resolution expresses the formal opinion of the House of Representatives that the United States should the and become a member of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

Why it matters

If adopted, this resolution would signal a shift in U.S. foreign policy regarding international judicial oversight, potentially impacting how the U.S. engages with international war crimes investigations.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

United States Government

The resolution proposes a change in the nation's formal stance regarding international treaty participation.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this resolution make the U.S. a member of the International Criminal Court?
No. This is a 'sense of the House' resolution, which expresses an opinion but does not change federal law or bind the U.S. to join the court.
What is the Rome Statute?
The is the international treaty that established the International Criminal Court.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

Coverage by outlet perspective1 article
Center 1
Blind spot - only covered by center outlets

Bias ratings based on AllSides / Media Bias/Fact Check

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Jul 15, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
  2. Jul 15, 2026House
    Submitted in House

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Proposed International Policy Change

The resolution advocates for a reversal of the long-standing U.S. policy of non-participation in the International Criminal Court.

Connected Entities

Rome Statute, House of Representatives, Committee on the Judiciary and 2 more
otherRome Statute“The international treaty that established the International Criminal Court.”Map →
OrganizationHouse of Representatives“The legislative body expressing the sense of the resolution.”Map →
OrganizationCommittee on the Judiciary“The committee to which the resolution was referred.”Map →
OrganizationHouse Foreign Affairs Committee“The committee to which the resolution was referred.”Map →
OrganizationInternational Criminal Court“The international tribunal that investigates and prosecutes individuals for geno”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy85
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record