POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Wisconsin SB 1123 Raises State Minimum Wage to $20 by 2030 and Allows Local Ordinances

Original title: An Act to repeal 104.001, 104.01 (5g) and 104.045 (1); to amend 104.045 (title); to repeal and recreate 104.035; to create 104.01 (1g), 104.01 (6m) and 227.01 (13) (Lw) of the statutes; Relating to: a state minimum wage, allowing the enactment of local minimum wage ordinances, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Last action · March 23, 2026: Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1Sponsors: Kelda Roys and 42 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

This bill raises the state minimum wage to $15 per hour upon enactment and scales it up to $20 per hour by 2030 for non-, while establishing a delayed schedule for s of 50 or fewer workers. It also indexes future wage increases to inflation beginning in 2031 and removes the state-level ban preventing cities, villages, towns, and counties from enacting local minimum wage ordinances.

Why it matters

Low-wage workers across Wisconsin would see baseline hourly earnings rise immediately and incrementally over several years, while municipal governments would regain the legal authority to set their own localized wage standards.

Background
  • Wisconsin law previously maintained a static state minimum wage of $7.25 per hour, matching the federal minimum wage, and explicitly preempted local municipalities from enacting higher or independent minimum wage requirements. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Non-tipped employees

Hourly wage rates increase immediately to $15 and scale up to $20 per hour by 2030, with subsequent inflation adjustments.

Directly affected

Tipped employees

Minimum hourly wages for tipped workers increase to $7.50 initially and scale up to set percentages of the standard minimum wage.

Directly affected

Small employers

Employers with 50 or fewer workers are subject to a delayed timeline for reaching the full standard minimum wage.

Directly affected

Cities, villages, towns, and counties

Local governments regain the legal authority to enact and administer local minimum wage ordinances.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

How are small employers defined and treated under the legislation?
A is defined as one that employs 50 or fewer employees. They follow a more gradual wage progression timeline, reaching the standard state minimum wage by January 1, 2034.
Can local municipalities pass their own minimum wage laws if this passes?
Yes. The bill eliminates the current prohibition preventing cities, villages, towns, and counties from enacting and administering local minimum wage ordinances.
What happens to the minimum wage after 2030?
Beginning on January 1, 2031, the Department of Workforce Development must annually adjust the minimum wage based on the , ensuring it remains at least $20 per hour.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Failed in the Senate.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Mar 23, 2026Senate
    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
  2. Mar 19, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development
  3. Mar 19, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced by Senators Roys, Drake, Larson, Spreitzer and Carpenter; cosponsored by Representatives Cruz, Clancy, Tenorio, Anderson, Arney, Bare, Brown, DeSanto, DeSmidt, Fitzgerald, Goodwin, Haywood, Hong, Hysell, Joers, Johnson, Kirsch, Madison, Mayadev, McCarville, McGuire, Miresse, Moore Omokunde, Palmeri, Phelps, Prado, Rivera-Wagner, Roe, Sheehan, Sinicki, Spaude, Stubbs, Subeck, Taylor, Udell, Vining, Snodgrass and Stroud

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Show 38 more sponsors
CruzSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
ClancySenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
TenorioSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
AndersonSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
ArneySenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
BareSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
BrownSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
DeSantoSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
DeSmidtSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
FitzgeraldSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
GoodwinSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
HaywoodSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
HongSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
HysellSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
JoersSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
KirschSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
MadisonSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
MayadevSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
McCarvilleSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
McGuireSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
MiresseSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
PalmeriSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
PhelpsSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
PradoSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
Rivera-WagnerSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
RoeSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
SheehanSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
SinickiSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
SpaudeSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
StubbsSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
SubeckSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
TaylorSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
UdellSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
ViningSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
SnodgrassSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
StroudSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift99% confidence

Restoration of Local Minimum Wage Authority

The legislation removes the existing statutory preemption that blocks cities, villages, towns, and counties from establishing local minimum wage laws.

Connected Entities

Kelda Roys, DeSanto, Haywood and 42 more
PersonKelda Roys“Wisconsin state senator sponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonDeSanto“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonHaywood“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonMiresse“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonArney“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonMoore Omokunde“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonSpaude“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonHong“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonMcCarville“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonJoers“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonSnodgrass“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonHysell“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonDeSmidt“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonClancy“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonBrown“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonStubbs“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonCruz“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonSheehan“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonLaTonya Johnson“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonKirsch“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
OrganizationBureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor“Federal agency that determines the consumer price index.”Map →
PersonMayadev“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonMadison“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonTenorio“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonStroud“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonSinicki“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonRoe“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonBare“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonChris Larson“Wisconsin state senator sponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonPhelps“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Workforce Development“State agency tasked with revising minimum wages based on the consumer price inde”Map →
PersonRivera-Wagner“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonUdell“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonAnderson“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonGoodwin“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonDora Drake“Wisconsin state senator sponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonFitzgerald“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonTaylor“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonSubeck“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonVining“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonPrado“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonMcGuire“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonTim Carpenter“Wisconsin state senator sponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonMark Spreitzer“Wisconsin state senator sponsoring SB 1123”Map →
PersonPalmeri“Wisconsin state representative cosponsoring SB 1123”Map →

Sources

Open source document

docs.legis.wisconsin.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 90)
  • Controversy85
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz75
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record