POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Texas restricts political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists and pay certain association dues

Original title: Relating to the use by a political subdivision of public funds for lobbying activities.

Last action · August 20, 2025: Referred to State AffairsSponsors: Mayes Middleton and 15 others

Companion · HB 81same policy, House versionCompanion · HB 96same policy, House version
+3 more versions
Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

s in Texas are prohibited from spending public funds to hire registered lobbyists or pay dues to nonprofit associations that represent political subdivisions and employ registered lobbyists, effective 91 days after the legislative session ends. The restriction does not apply to associations that solely represent elected sheriffs or individual law enforcement officers, nor does it ban individual officials or employees from providing information to legislators.

Why it matters

Local governments face statutory spending limits on representation, while taxpayers gain the legal right to sue for injunctions and recover attorney's fees if local public funds are unlawfully directed toward lobbying activities.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Political subdivisions

Political subdivisions are barred from spending public funds on registered lobbyists and certain association dues.

Directly affected

Taxpayers and residents of political subdivisions

Taxpayers gain the right to sue for injunctive relief and recover attorney's fees against political subdivisions violating the lobbying restrictions.

Directly affected

Nonprofit associations representing political subdivisions

Associations that employ registered lobbyists may lose dues payments from political subdivisions unless exempt.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What recourse do taxpayers have if a local government violates these restrictions?
A taxpayer or resident is entitled to seek appropriate to stop further prohibited payments and can recover reasonable attorney's fees and costs if they win the action.
Are all associations representing local governments affected?
The restriction applies to nonprofit associations that primarily represent s and hire or contract with registered lobbyists, but it explicitly exempts associations that solely represent elected sheriffs or individual law enforcement officers.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the Senate · in House committee.

Procedural history

45 actions
  1. Aug 20, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to State Affairs
  2. Aug 20, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Read first time
  3. Aug 20, 2025House
    Received from the Senate
  4. Aug 19, 2025Senate
    Reported engrossed
  5. Aug 19, 2025Senate
    Reason for vote recorded in Journal
  6. Aug 19, 2025SenateFloor
    Record vote
Show 39 earlier actions
  1. Aug 19, 2025SenateFloor
    Passed
  2. Aug 19, 2025SenateFloor
    Read 3rd time
  3. Aug 19, 2025Senate
    Laid before the Senate
  4. Aug 18, 2025SenateFloor
    Record vote
  5. Aug 18, 2025SenateFloor
    Passed to engrossment
  6. Aug 18, 2025SenateFloor
    Record vote
  7. Aug 18, 2025Senate
    Amendment fails of adoption
  8. Aug 18, 2025Senate
    Amendment(s) offered (FA6 Menéndez)
  9. Aug 18, 2025SenateFloor
    Record vote
  10. Aug 18, 2025Senate
    Amendment fails of adoption
  11. Aug 18, 2025Senate
    Amendment(s) offered (FA5 Menéndez)
  12. Aug 18, 2025SenateFloor
    Record vote
  13. Aug 18, 2025Senate
    Amendment fails of adoption
  14. Aug 18, 2025Senate
    Amendment(s) offered (FA4 Eckhardt)
  15. Aug 18, 2025SenateFloor
    Record vote
  16. Aug 18, 2025Senate
    Amendment fails of adoption
  17. Aug 18, 2025Senate
    Amendment(s) offered (FA3 Eckhardt)
  18. Aug 18, 2025SenateFloor
    Record vote
  19. Aug 18, 2025Senate
    Amendment fails of adoption
  20. Aug 18, 2025Senate
    Amendment(s) offered (FA13 Menéndez)
  21. Aug 18, 2025SenateFloor
    Record vote
  22. Aug 18, 2025Senate
    Amendment fails of adoption
  23. Aug 18, 2025Senate
    Amendment(s) offered (FA1 Menéndez)
  24. Aug 18, 2025SenateFloor
    Read 2nd time
  25. Aug 18, 2025SenateFloor
    Record vote
  26. Aug 18, 2025Senate
    Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  27. Aug 18, 2025Senate
    Co-author authorized
  28. Aug 15, 2025Senate
    Committee report printed and distributed
  29. Aug 15, 2025SenateCommittee
    Reported favorably w/o amendments
  30. Aug 15, 2025Senate
    Vote taken in committee
  31. Aug 15, 2025Senate
    Testimony taken in committee
  32. Aug 15, 2025Senate
    Considered in public hearing
  33. Aug 15, 2025Senate
    Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  34. Aug 15, 2025SenateFloor
    Record vote
  35. Aug 15, 2025Senate
    Posting rule suspended
  36. Aug 15, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to State Affairs
  37. Aug 15, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Read first time
  38. Aug 15, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Filed
  39. Aug 15, 2025Senate
    Received by the Secretary of the Senate

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of Taxpayer Enforcement Rights

The measure establishes a statutory right for individual taxpayers to seek injunctive relief and recover attorney's fees against local governments for lobbying expenditures.

Connected Entities

Chapter 556, Government Code, Section 89.002, Local Government Code, Chapter 305
otherChapter 556, Government Code“Amended to add restrictions on lobbying by political subdivisions”Map →
otherSection 89.002, Local Government Code“Amended regarding county general fund expenditures for state association of coun”Map →
otherChapter 305“References lobbyist registration requirements”Map →

Sources

Open source document

capitol.texas.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz45
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record