Regulation of Geoengineering and Weather Modification Activities
April 30, 2025
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The bill creates new legal prohibitions and reporting requirements for activities affecting the atmosphere, with potential civil penalties up to $200,000 for violations and the loss of state funding for non-compliant .
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Public-use airport operators
Must report monthly to the Department of Transportation regarding aircraft equipped with dispersal components.
Department of Environmental Protection
Tasked with establishing reporting methods, investigating complaints, and enforcing the new prohibitions.
Department of Transportation
Required to collect reports from infrastructure operators and withhold state funding from non-compliant entities.
Last recorded activity April 30, 2025.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I report a suspected weather modification activity?
What happens if an airport is found to be non-compliant?
Are there penalties for violating these rules?
Why It Matters
The bill creates new legal prohibitions and reporting requirements for activities affecting the atmosphere, with potential civil penalties up to $200,000 for violations and the loss of state funding for non-compliant .
News Coverage
Voting Record
Favorable (State Affairs Committee)
Total
25
Yes
14
No
9
Present
0
Not Voting
2
Abstain
0
How they voted (25)
Adam Botana
Republican · yes
Anna Eskamani
Democratic · no
Will Robinson
Republican · yes
Joe Casello
Democratic · no
Mike Caruso
Republican · yes
Lindsay Cross
Democratic · no
Fabián Basabe
Republican · yes
Debra Tendrich
Democratic · no
Dotie Joseph
Democratic · no
Wyman Duggan
Republican · yes
Nan Cobb
Republican · yes
Randy Maggard
Republican · yes
Mike Giallombardo
Republican · yes
Angie Nixon
Democratic · no
Ashley Gantt
Democratic · no
Linda Chaney
Republican · yes
John Snyder
Republican · yes
Richard Gentry
Republican · no
Alex Rizo
Republican · not voting
Meg Weinberger
Republican · yes
Omar Blanco
Republican · yes
Griff Griffitts
Republican · yes
Jim Mooney
Republican · no
Karen Gonzalez Pittman
Republican · yes
+ 1 more
Favorable With Committee Substitute (Natural Resources & Disasters Subcommittee)
Total
17
Yes
16
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
1
Abstain
0
How they voted (17)
Alex Andrade
Republican · yes
Kelly Skidmore
Democratic · yes
Debra Tendrich
Democratic · yes
Bill Conerly
Republican · yes
Tiffany Esposito
Republican · yes
Adam Botana
Republican · yes
Lindsay Cross
Democratic · yes
Allison Tant
Democratic · yes
Michele Rayner
Democratic · yes
Richard Gentry
Republican · yes
Jim Mooney
Republican · yes
Tom Fabricio
Republican · yes
Adam Anderson
Republican · yes
Yvette Benarroch
Republican · yes
Jason Shoaf
Republican · not voting
Randy Maggard
Republican · yes
Dean Black
Republican · yes
Sponsors
Show 3 more sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Transition from Licensing to Prohibition
The bill shifts state policy from a licensing-based regulatory framework for weather modification to a total prohibition model.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy60Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment20Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools