POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Kansas SB 512 alters unemployment insurance rules by removing temporary unemployment caps and excluding supplemental benefits from wages

Original title: AN ACT concerning unemployment insurance; removing the eight-week return to work expectation from the definition of temporary unemployment; deleting the eight-week cap on temporary unemployment; removing the secretary's authority and criteria to grant eight-week extension increments, employer reporting duties for extensions and the industry-specific eligibility for extensions; excluding payments under compliant employer-sponsored supplemental unemployment benefit plans from the definition of wages; removing the negative debt write-off and forgiveness mechanism that conditionally moved employers to rate groups N11 for three years and the related option to avoid a negative debt write-off through voluntary contributions; prohibiting charging contributing employers in ready-mixed concrete and specified construction industries for benefit charges arising from temporary layoffs; amending K.S.A. 2025 Supp. 44-703, 44-710, 44-710a and 44-775 and repealing the existing sections.

Last action · April 10, 2026: Died in Committee

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

AN ACT concerning unemployment insurance; removing the eight-week return to work expectation from the definition of temporary unemployment; deleting the eight-week cap on temporary unemployment; removing the secretary's authority and criteria to grant eight-week extension increments, employer reporting duties for extensions and the industry-specific eligibility for extensions; excluding payments under compliant employer-sponsored supplemental unemployment benefit plans from the definition of wages; removing the negative debt write-off and forgiveness mechanism that conditionally moved employers to rate groups N11 for three years and the related option to avoid a negative debt write-off through voluntary contributions; prohibiting charging contributing employers in ready-mixed concrete and specified construction industries for benefit charges arising from temporary layoffs; amending K.S.A. 2025 Supp. 44-703, 44-710, 44-710a and 44-775 and repealing the existing sections.

Why it matters

The bill alters employer tax calculations, debt write-offs, and benefit charging rules for seasonal and construction industries while restructuring definitions and supplemental benefit exemptions for workers.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Contributing employers

Account charging rules, tax classifications, and debt write-off mechanisms are altered by the repeal of rate group N11 forgiveness and new layoff exemptions.

Directly affected

Ready-mixed concrete and specified construction employers

Contributing employers in these industries are prohibited from being charged for benefit payments arising from temporary layoffs.

Directly affected

Unemployment insurance claimants

Claimants experience modified definitions of temporary unemployment and separate treatment for employer-sponsored supplemental unemployment benefit payments.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What changes regarding temporary unemployment under SB 512?
The bill removes the eight-week cap and return-to-work expectation from the definition of , as well as the secretary's authority to grant eight-week extension increments.
Are supplemental unemployment benefit payments considered wages under the bill?
No. Payments under compliant employer-sponsored s are explicitly excluded from the definition of wages and remuneration for eligibility and benefit calculation purposes.
What happens to the negative debt write-off mechanism for employers?
The measure removes the negative debt write-off and forgiveness mechanism that conditionally moved employers to for three years, along with the associated voluntary contribution avoidance option.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Apr 10, 2026Senate
    Died in Committee
  2. Mar 10, 2026Senate
    Withdrawn from Senate Committee on Commerce; Referred to Senate Committee on Commerce
  3. Feb 17, 2026SenateCommittee
    Referred to Senate Committee on Assessment and Taxation
  4. Feb 16, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Repeal of Negative Debt Write-Off Mechanism

The bill completely removes the conditional negative debt write-off and forgiveness mechanism that placed negative rated employers into rate group N11.

Connected Entities

Kansas Department of Commerce, Kansas Department of Labor, Senate Committee on Assessment and Taxation and 1 more
OrganizationKansas Department of Commerce“Partners on the my reemployment plan and workforce services”Map →
OrganizationKansas Department of Labor“Administers unemployment insurance and employment security law”Map →
locationKansas“Jurisdiction of enactment”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.kslegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record