The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Wisconsin bill caps stadium food and beverage markups at 20 percent for publicly funded venues
Last action · March 23, 2026: Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1Sponsors: Sarah Keyeski and 14 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Senate Bill 1129 prohibits owners, operators, and s of publicly funded sports and entertainment stadiums in Wisconsin from selling food or beverages at a markup exceeding 20 percent above the retailer's cost. The bill defines covered stadiums as multipurpose facilities holding at least 3,000 people that receive direct or indirect , excluding primary, secondary, and tribal schools. Violations are classified as s enforced by the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection.
Stadium visitors at qualifying publicly funded venues would see statutory limits on concession pricing, restricting food and drink markups to a maximum of 20 percent over wholesale cost.
- Senate Bill 1129 was introduced in the Wisconsin legislature during the 2025-2026 session and referred to the Committee on Utilities, Technology and Tourism before failing to pass. context
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
stadium owners, operators, and concessionaires
Their pricing structures for food and beverages at qualifying facilities are restricted to a maximum markup of 20 percent over cost.
Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection
The department is tasked with enforcing violations of the new unfair trade practice provisions.
stadium visitors and consumers
They are subject to statutory limits on the prices charged for food and drinks at qualifying venues.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which stadiums are covered by this price cap?
Are school sports facilities subject to this rule?
Who enforces the markup limit?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Failed in the Senate.
Procedural history
3 actions- Mar 23, 2026SenateFailed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
- Mar 19, 2026SenateIntroducedRead first time and referred to Committee on Utilities, Technology and Tourism
- Mar 19, 2026SenateIntroducedIntroduced by Senators Keyeski, Pfaff, Larson and Spreitzer; cosponsored by Representatives Bare, Miresse, Stubbs, Sinicki, Moore Omokunde, Udell, Joers, Clancy, Emerson, Stroud and Palmeri
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 10 more sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 55)
- Controversy60Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment15Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
