POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Kansas restructuring Prisoner Review Board, adding qualifications, and requiring victim notice before parole hearings

Original title: AN ACT concerning the prisoner review board; removing the board from the supervision of the secretary of corrections; changing the appointing authority for the members and creating qualifications for the members; requiring parole hearings to be postponed if proper notice of the public comment session is not made to the victim; amending K.S.A. 22-3709, 22-3710, 22-3711, 22-3713, 22-3728, 22-3729 and 75-52,152 and K.S.A. 2025 Supp. 22-3717, 74-4911f, 75-4318, 75-5217 and 77-421 and repealing the existing sections.

Last action · April 9, 2026: Enrolled and presented to Governor on Monday, March 30, 2026

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

SB 459 removes the Prisoner Review Board from the supervision of the Secretary of Corrections, changes its appointment structure to a five-member board appointed by multiple authorities with specific professional qualifications, and mandates the postponement of parole hearings if proper notice of public comment sessions is not provided to victims.

Why it matters

Changes who appoints state parole board members, establishes mandatory professional background requirements for those seats, and creates a strict legal requirement to delay parole decisions if crime victims or their families are not properly notified of public input sessions.

Background
  • The Prisoner Review Board in Kansas evaluates inmates for parole, conditional release, and postrelease supervision conditions. context
  • State correctional policies in Kansas frequently intersect with statutory requirements regarding victim notification and sentencing guidelines. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Prisoner Review Board members

Board members face new appointment structures, professional qualification requirements, four-year terms, and full-time salary adjustments pegged to judicial pay.

Directly affected

Crime victims and their families

Victims and their families receive mandatory advance written notice of public comment sessions, and parole decisions must be delayed if notice is omitted for serious crimes.

Directly affected

Secretary of Corrections

The secretary no longer supervises the Prisoner Review Board, though the Department of Corrections continues to provide personnel, accounting services, and supervision support.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who appoints the members of the restructured Prisoner Review Board?
Members are appointed by authorities including the governor, the attorney general, the president of the senate, and the speaker of the house of representatives, subject to senate confirmation.
What happens if a crime victim is not notified of a parole public comment session for an off-grid or class A felony?
The board must postpone the public comment session and any decision on parole for that inmate to a time at least 30 days after proper notification is given.
Are board members required to work full-time?
Yes, each member of the board is required to devote full time to the duties of membership on the board.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

24 actions
  1. Apr 9, 2026Senate
    Enrolled and presented to Governor on Monday, March 30, 2026
  2. Apr 9, 2026SenateEnrolled
    Approved by Governor on Tuesday, April 7, 2026
  3. Mar 26, 2026Senate
    Concurred with amendments in conference
  4. Mar 23, 2026Senate
    Nonconcurred with amendments; Conference Committee requested; appointed , and
  5. Mar 23, 2026HouseFloor
    Motion to accede adopted; Representative Lewis, Representative Barrett, Representative Schlingensiepen, , appointed as conferees
  6. Mar 18, 2026House
    Committee of the Whole - Now working on
Show 18 earlier actions
  1. Mar 18, 2026HouseFloor
    Committee of the Whole - Committee Report be adopted
  2. Mar 18, 2026HouseFloor
    Committee of the Whole - Be passed as amended
  3. Mar 18, 2026HouseFloor
    Motion to advance to Emergency Final Action adopted
  4. Mar 18, 2026HouseFloor
    Emergency Final Action - Passed as amended
  5. Mar 17, 2026HouseFloor
    Committee Report recommending bill be passed as amended by
  6. Mar 2, 2026House
    Hearing: Monday, March 2, 2026, 1:30 PM — Room 546-S
  7. Feb 24, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Received and Introduced
  8. Feb 24, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred to House Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice
  9. Feb 18, 2026SenateFloor
    Final Action - Passed as amended
  10. Feb 17, 2026Senate
    Committee of the Whole - Now working on
  11. Feb 17, 2026SenateFloor
    Committee of the Whole - Committee Report be adopted
  12. Feb 17, 2026Senate
    Committee of the Whole - Motion to Amend - Offered by
  13. Feb 17, 2026SenateFloor
    Committee of the Whole - Amendment by was adopted
  14. Feb 17, 2026SenateFloor
    Committee of the Whole - Be passed as further amended
  15. Feb 16, 2026SenateFloor
    Committee Report recommending bill be passed as amended by
  16. Feb 9, 2026Senate
    Hearing: Monday, February 9, 2026, 10:30 AM — Room 346-S
  17. Feb 4, 2026SenateCommittee
    Referred to Senate Committee on Judiciary
  18. Feb 3, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Independence of Prisoner Review Board

The legislation formally separates the Prisoner Review Board from the administrative supervision of the Secretary of Corrections while establishing rigorous professional qualifications for appointed members.

Connected Entities

Prisoner Review Board, Secretary of Corrections, Federal Bureau of Investigation and 4 more
OrganizationPrisoner Review Board“State board responsible for parole and conditional release decisions”Map →
PersonSecretary of Corrections“State official previously supervising the board and managing correctional facili”Map →
OrganizationFederal Bureau of Investigation“Federal agency that may be notified regarding violation warrants”Map →
OrganizationKansas Public Employees Retirement System“State retirement system referenced for state officers”Map →
PersonAttorney General“Appointing authority for board members”Map →
OrganizationKansas Department of Corrections“State department operating correctional institutions”Map →
PersonGovernor“Appointing authority for board members”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.kslegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record