POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofLabor →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Rhode Island Bill Makes Construction Contractors Civilly Liable for Subcontractor Wage Theft

Original title: AN ACT RELATING TO LABOR AND LABOR RELATIONS -- PAYMENT OF WAGES (Makes construction contractors civilly liable and/or jointly civilly liable for any claims of wage theft or nonpayment from an employee against the contractor, its subcontractors and any subcontractor.)

Last action · March 18, 2026: Committee recommended measure be held for further studySponsors: David Bennett and 9 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Construction contractors in Rhode Island are made civilly and for or nonpayment claims brought by employees against the contractor, its subcontractors, and any lower-tier subcontractors.

Why it matters

Workers can seek unpaid wages directly from prime contractors on a construction project if a subcontractor fails to pay, shifting the financial recourse channel for wage disputes.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Construction Contractors

Construction contractors face new civil and joint liability for wage theft and nonpayment claims originating from employees of their subcontractors.

Directly affected

Construction Workers

Construction workers gain an additional legal avenue to recover unpaid wages or address wage theft by holding primary contractors responsible alongside subcontractors.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who can be held liable for unpaid wages under this bill?
Construction contractors can be held civilly and for or nonpayment claims made by employees against the contractor, its subcontractors, or any subcontractor.
What kind of claims are covered by this legislation?
Claims regarding or nonpayment of wages owed to an employee working within the construction contractor and subcontractor framework.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Mar 18, 2026
    Committee recommended measure be held for further study
  2. Mar 13, 2026
    Scheduled for hearing and/or consideration (03/18/2026)
  3. Feb 27, 2026Introduced
    Introduced, referred to House Labor

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Arthur Handy, David Bennett, David Morales and 7 more
PersonArthur Handy“Cosponsor of House Bill 7961”Map →
PersonDavid Bennett“Primary sponsor of House Bill 7961”Map →
PersonDavid Morales“Cosponsor of House Bill 7961”Map →
PersonLauren Carson“Cosponsor of House Bill 7961”Map →
PersonDoc Corvese“Cosponsor of House Bill 7961”Map →
PersonRaymond Hull“Cosponsor of House Bill 7961”Map →
PersonJune Speakman“Cosponsor of House Bill 7961”Map →
PersonJoseph McNamara“Cosponsor of House Bill 7961”Map →
PersonEvan Shanley“Cosponsor of House Bill 7961”Map →
PersonCarol McEntee“Cosponsor of House Bill 7961”Map →

Sources

Open source document

status.rilegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record