POLISCOPE
Back to feed
AB 442CALIFORNIASession 20252026
Recently Updated

AB 442 increases timberland acreage limits and removes hydrological area restrictions for forest management plans

Original title: Z'berg-Nejedly Forest Practice Act of 1973: working forest management plans: nonindustrial timber management plans.

August 24, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Currently Unknown. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Introduced.

Last action
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.May 6, 2026

Version history & redline

3 versions on file

Official version history is partial: 3 linked texts are unavailable or incomplete. Source links remain available below.

Comparing 02/06/25 - Introduced04/21/25 - Amended Assembly
removed addedOfficial text

The text diff for this stage has not been computed yet.

OpenStates mirror retained for redline only; official linked text was unavailable

Redline computed from the official version text (record lane).View this version →

The Frame

What this does

These changes expand the scale of operations for private timberland owners and simplify the geographic requirements for forest management planning, directly affecting how landowners manage and harvest timber across California.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Nonindustrial tree farmers

These landowners are eligible for higher acreage limits for their timber management plans.

Working forest landowners

These landowners are eligible for higher acreage limits and are no longer restricted by hydrological area boundaries.

Southern Subdistrict of the Coast Forest District

Landowners in this district lose their previous exemption from working forest management plan provisions.

What changed

Last recorded activity August 24, 2026.

What's next

Introduced.

Summary

AB 442 increases the maximum allowable acreage for s from 2,500 to 4,000 acres and for s from 10,000 to 15,000 acres. The bill also removes the requirement that harvest areas be contained within a single and eliminates the current exemption for the Southern Subdistrict of the Coast Forest District.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Why It Matters

These changes expand the scale of operations for private timberland owners and simplify the geographic requirements for forest management planning, directly affecting how landowners manage and harvest timber across California.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much more land can I include in my nonindustrial timber management plan under this bill?
The limit increases from 2,500 acres to 4,000 acres.
Does this bill change where I can harvest timber?
Yes, it removes the requirement that harvest areas must be contained within a single , allowing for more flexible planning across different watersheds.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Expansion of Timberland Management Scale

The bill represents a clear policy shift toward allowing larger-scale private timber management by increasing acreage caps by 60% for nonindustrial plans and 50% for working forest plans.

Connected Entities

otherZ'berg-Nejedly Forest Practice Act of 1973The primary state law governing forest management and timber harvesting.Map →
organizationDepartment of Forestry and Fire ProtectionThe state agency responsible for receiving and approving timber management and hMap →
locationSouthern Subdistrict of the Coast Forest DistrictA specific geographic region currently exempt from certain working forest manageMap →

Sources

Open source document

openstates.org

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record