The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Senate Hearing on River Basin Funding and Libby Dam Modifications (1969)
Record date · July 20, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This document is a transcript record of a 1969 Senate subcommittee hearing regarding two legislative proposals: S. 3106, which seeks additional funding for river basin flood control and navigation projects, and S. 3200, which proposes modifications to the Libby Dam project in Montana.
The hearing addresses the authorization of federal funds for large-scale water infrastructure projects, directly impacting the budget and construction scope for flood control and navigation systems in various river basins.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Residents of river basin areas
These residents are impacted by the flood control and navigation infrastructure projects funded by the proposed appropriations.
Montana residents near the Kootenai River
These residents are affected by the proposed modifications to the Libby Dam project.
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on December 3, 1969, during the 91st Congress.
- S. 3106 proposes authorizing additional appropriations for comprehensive river basin plans.
- The scope of S. 3106 includes projects for flood control and navigation.
- S. 3200 specifically addresses modifications to the Libby Dam project.
Show all 5 facts
- The Libby Dam is located on the Kootenai River in Montana.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of S. 3106?
What does S. 3200 propose?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance60How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
