POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Kansas bill restricts mail-in voting if signature rules are invalidated and requires election lawsuits in Shawnee County

Original title: AN ACT concerning elections; relating to signature verification for advance voting ballots; concerning court order that invalidate or enjoin signature verification triggering a limitation on advance voting; establishing the district court in Shawnee county as the proper venue for bringing all constitutional challenges of election laws; amending K.S.A. 25-1119 and 25-1121 and repealing the existing sections.

Last action · April 10, 2026: Died on House Calendar

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Kansas legislation requires the secretary of state to restrict mail-in advance voting if courts invalidate rules, and mandates that all statewide election law challenges be filed exclusively in Shawnee County District Court.

Why it matters

Voters face potential limits on mail-in voting if current signature rules are struck down by courts, and legal challengers must file statewide election lawsuits in a single specific county court.

Background
  • Advance voting in Kansas allows eligible registered voters to cast ballots prior to election day either by mail or in person. context
  • Signature verification requirements for mail-in ballots have been a subject of ongoing legal scrutiny and litigation across multiple states. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Registered voters in Kansas

Voters face potential limitations on eligibility for mail-in advance voting if court orders invalidate signature verification rules.

Directly affected

Secretary of State

The secretary is required to monitor court litigation, publish notices in the Kansas register, and prescribe ballot envelope forms and instructions.

Directly affected

District court of Shawnee county

The court is designated as the mandatory exclusive venue for all statewide constitutional challenges to election laws.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What triggers the restriction on mail-in advance voting?
A state or federal court order or judgment that invalidates or enjoins the enforcement of requirements contained in K.S.A. 25-1124(h) triggers the restriction, following publication of notice by the secretary of state.
Where must lawsuits challenging state election laws be filed?
Any action alleging that a statewide election law or regulation violates the federal or state constitution must be brought in the district court of Shawnee county.
Who is permitted to vote by advance ballot if mail-in voting is restricted?
Voters who are absent from their county on election day, unable to attend due to sickness, physical disability, or religious belief, or serving as an election board judge or clerk remain permitted to vote by advance ballot.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

14 actions
  1. Apr 10, 2026House
    Died on House Calendar
  2. Mar 18, 2026HouseFloor
    Committee Report recommending substitute bill be passed by
  3. Mar 10, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Received and Introduced
  4. Mar 10, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred to House Committee on Elections
  5. Mar 10, 2026House
    Hearing: Tuesday, March 10, 2026, 3:30 PM — Room 218-N
  6. Mar 5, 2026Senate
    Committee of the Whole - Now working on
Show 8 earlier actions
  1. Mar 5, 2026SenateFloor
    Committee of the Whole - Committee Report be adopted
  2. Mar 5, 2026SenateFloor
    Committee of the Whole - Be passed as amended
  3. Mar 5, 2026Senate
    fa_fabc_912
  4. Mar 5, 2026SenateFloor
    Emergency Final Action - Passed as amended
  5. Feb 12, 2026SenateFloor
    Committee Report recommending bill be passed as amended by
  6. Feb 2, 2026Senate
    Hearing: Monday, February 2, 2026, 10:30 AM — Room 144-S
  7. Jan 28, 2026SenateCommittee
    Referred to Senate Committee on Federal and State Affairs
  8. Jan 27, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

2 patterns noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Conditional Voting Restriction Mechanism

The bill creates a conditional legal trigger linking executive and judicial actions directly to statutory changes in voter eligibility without requiring a new legislative vote.

cross reference95% confidence

Centralization of Election Litigation

By mandating that all statewide constitutional challenges to election laws be filed in Shawnee County, the bill consolidates all such challenges into a single local judicial district.

Connected Entities

Secretary of State, Kansas Legislature, Shawnee County and 1 more
OrganizationSecretary of State“Responsible for monitoring litigation and publishing notices in the Kansas regis”Map →
OrganizationKansas Legislature“The legislative body enacting the bill.”Map →
locationShawnee County“Location of the district court required for all statewide election law challenge”Map →
locationKansas“The state jurisdiction where the law applies.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.kslegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 80)
  • Controversy85
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record