POLISCOPE
Back to feed
OAKLAND (ALAMEDA COUNTY)local legislationPassed
Passed

Settlement of Lawsuit: O'Neill and Paige v. City of Oakland

Original title: Subject: Tom O’Neill, Mabel Paige V. City Of Oakland, A Municipal Corporation, Nakiah M. Ward, Does 1 To 50 From: Office Of The City Attorney Recommendation: Adopt A Resolution Authorizing And Directing The City Attorney To Compromise And Settle The Cases Of Tom O’Neill And Mabel Paige V. City Of Oakland, A Municipal Corporation, Nakiah M. Ward, Does 1 To 50, Alameda County Superior Court Case Nos. 23CV035142, 23CV035146, City Attorney File Nos. 35480, 35480-1, In The Sum Of One Hundred Thousand Dollars And Zero Cents ($100,000.00) (Department Of Transportation - Dangerous Condition Of Public Property)

March 16, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The city will pay $100,000 in public funds to settle claims related to a managed by the Department of Transportation.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Tom O'Neill

The plaintiff receives the settlement funds as part of the legal resolution.

Mabel Paige

The plaintiff receives the settlement funds as part of the legal resolution.

City of Oakland Taxpayers

Public funds are being used to pay the $100,000 settlement.

What changed

Last recorded activity March 16, 2026.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Oakland City Council has approved a $100,000 settlement to resolve two lawsuits filed against the city regarding a . The cases involved Tom O'Neill and Mabel Paige and were handled by the City Attorney's office.

Key Facts

  • The City Council authorized a settlement of $100,000 to resolve two lawsuits.
  • The lawsuits are titled Tom O'Neill and Mabel Paige v. City of Oakland, Nakiah M. Ward, et al.
  • The legal cases are identified by Alameda County Superior Court Case Nos. 23CV035142 and 23CV035146.
  • The City Attorney's file numbers for these cases are 35480 and 35480-1.
  • The claims involve allegations of a 'dangerous condition of public property' under the jurisdiction of the Department of Transportation.
  • The resolution was passed during a Special Concurrent Meeting of the Oakland Redevelopment Successor Agency/City Council on March 9, 2026.

Why It Matters

The city will pay $100,000 in public funds to settle claims related to a managed by the Department of Transportation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this $100,000 payment for?
It is a settlement payment to resolve two lawsuits filed against the City of Oakland regarding a .
Which city department is involved in this case?
The Department of Transportation is identified as the department responsible for the public property in question.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Department of Transportation Liability

The settlement highlights a specific liability claim against the Department of Transportation for public property maintenance.

Connected Entities

personNakiah M. WardNamed defendant in the lawsuit.Map →
personTom O'NeillPlaintiff in the lawsuit against the City of Oakland.Map →
organizationCity of OaklandDefendant in the legal cases.Map →
personMabel PaigePlaintiff in the lawsuit against the City of Oakland.Map →
locationAlameda County Superior CourtCourt where the cases were filed.Map →

Sources

Open source document

webapi.legistar.com

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record