The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.1975 Senate Hearings on Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Amendments
Record date · July 20, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This document records the 1975 Senate hearings regarding proposed amendments to the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act. The hearings focused on two specific legislative proposals, S. 2042 and S. 2183, aimed at updating federal safety regulations for natural gas pipelines.
These hearings established the legislative record for federal safety standards governing the transport of natural gas, which directly impacts the regulatory requirements for pipeline operators and the safety protocols for infrastructure near residential areas.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Natural gas pipeline operators
These entities are subject to the safety regulations and amendments discussed in the legislation.
General public
Residents living near pipeline infrastructure are affected by the safety standards and enforcement mechanisms established by the Act.
Key Facts
- The Subcommittee on Surface Transportation held hearings on September 25 and 26, 1975.
- The hearings were convened to discuss proposed amendments to the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act.
- The legislative proposals under review were S. 2042 and S. 2183.
- The hearings took place during the first session of the Ninety-fourth Congress.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of these hearings?
When did these hearings occur?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance60How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
