POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Pennsylvania Bill 49 voids unenforced standardized contract terms that alter consumer legal rights

Original title: An Act amending the act of June 23, 1993 (P.L.128, No.29), known as the Plain Language Consumer Contract Act, further providing for definitions and providing for standardized terms in form contracts.

Last action · January 14, 2025: Referred to COMMUNICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY, Jan. 14, 2025Sponsors: Kristine Howard and 10 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Pennsylvania House Bill 49 invalidates standardized terms in merchant s that materially alter a consumer's legal rights or obligations without proper awareness, applying to electronic and paper contracts executed 60 days after enactment.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Consumers

Consumers gain protection from unenforced hidden or unnegotiated standardized contract terms that restrict legal rights.

Directly affected

Merchants

Merchants must ensure standardized form contract terms meet statutory notice and materiality requirements to remain enforceable.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if a form contract contains a hidden clause limiting a merchant's liability?
Under House Bill 49, such terms carry a of materially altering the contract and are unenforceable unless the consumer was expressly aware and had reasonable notice.
Does signing an electronic or paper contract mean I am automatically bound by all its standardized terms?
No. The bill explicitly states that a printed, typed, or electronic signature shall not be regarded as evidence of awareness of a standardized term.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jan 14, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to COMMUNICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY, Jan. 14, 2025

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Plain Language Consumer Contract Act
otherPlain Language Consumer Contract Act“The existing act being amended by House Bill 49”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.palegis.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record