POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Pennsylvania House Bill 290 Prohibits Polystyrene Food Containers and Utensils

Original title: An Act amending Title 27 (Environmental Resources) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in environmental protection, providing for polystyrene food container prohibition; and imposing penalties.

Last action · January 23, 2025: Referred to ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION, Jan. 23, 2025Sponsors: Tim Briggs and 18 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Pennsylvania House Bill 290 bans food establishments from dispensing prepared food in polystyrene foam or solid plastic containers and prohibits retailers from selling certain polystyrene items starting July 1, 2025. Violators face civil penalties ranging from $500 for a first offense to $2,000 for subsequent offenses. The legislation also s local municipal ordinances that conflict with the statewide ban.

Why it matters

Food vendors, restaurants, and retail stores across Pennsylvania must replace single-use foam cups, plates, containers, and polystyrene cutlery with alternative materials to avoid escalating civil fines. Consumers will encounter changes in take-out packaging and utensil availability at local eateries and grocery stores.

Background
  • House Bill 290 was introduced in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives during the 2025-2026 legislative session. context
  • Polystyrene, commonly known by the brand name Styrofoam, is a synthetic polymer widely used in single-use food service packaging due to its insulating properties and low cost, but it is frequently targeted by environmental legislation because it does not readily biodegrade. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Food establishments

Food establishments must alter their packaging and utensil offerings to eliminate polystyrene items for prepared food.

Directly affected

Retailers

Retailers must cease selling certain polystyrene containers unless the items fall under the exemptions for meat trays, egg cartons, or packing materials.

Directly affected

Consumers

Consumers will receive prepared food and beverages in alternative non-polystyrene packaging and utensils.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What items are included in the polystyrene ban?
The ban covers single-use polystyrene foam food service containers (such as cups, bowls, plates, clamshell containers, and unencased foam coolers) and single-use polystyrene solid plastic food containers (such as cups, bowls, plates, clamshell containers, cutlery, straws, and cup lids).
Are all polystyrene products banned for retailers?
No. Retailers are explicitly permitted to continue selling meat trays, egg cartons, and packing materials made from polystyrene.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jan 23, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION, Jan. 23, 2025

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Statewide Preemption of Local Ordinances

The bill explicitly overrides any existing or future local municipal ordinances that conflict with the new state polystyrene standards.

Connected Entities

Department of Environmental Protection
OrganizationDepartment of Environmental Protection“State department tasked with prescribing complaint procedures, maintaining a com”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.palegis.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record