Hearing on Federal Funding for Banks Lake Recreation
July 20, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The bill determines whether the federal government or local water users bear the financial responsibility for the upkeep of recreational areas at Banks Lake within the Columbia Basin Project.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Columbia Basin Project water users
These users would be relieved of the financial obligation to repay recreational maintenance costs if the bill passes.
U.S. Department of the Interior
The Secretary of the Interior would be granted the authority to make determinations regarding the reimbursement status of these costs.
Last recorded activity July 20, 2026.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Why It Matters
The bill determines whether the federal government or local water users bear the financial responsibility for the upkeep of recreational areas at Banks Lake within the Columbia Basin Project.
Key Facts
- S. 2310 proposes that the Secretary of the Interior be authorized to designate certain recreational maintenance costs at Banks Lake as nonreimbursable.
- The bill concerns the Columbia Basin Project, a large-scale federal water development.
- The hearing was held by the Subcommittee on Irrigation and Reclamation of the U.S. Senate Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs.
- The hearing took place on August 30, 1965, during the 89th Congress.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does 'nonreimbursable' mean in this context?
What is the purpose of S. 2310?
News Coverage
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Federal Cost Allocation
The bill reflects a mid-20th-century effort to clarify the federal government's role in funding recreational components of large-scale irrigation projects.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools