POLISCOPE
Back to feed
COCOA (BREVARD COUNTY) · LOCALlocal legislationAgenda Ready
Finance Detected

Approval of $1.89 Million Construction Contract with W&J Construction

Original title: Approve Participation in a Multi-Year Piggy-Back Agreement with W&J Construction Corporation for Construction Manager at Risk Services Utilizing Brevard County’s Continuing Construction Manager (At Risk) Services, Contract # RFQ 6-22-05 Effective July 7, 2022 through 11/21/2025, subject to the City Manager and the City Attorney finalizing and approving the form of the contract; Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Piggyback Agreement, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and any Amendments and Renewals Under the Existing Contract. Approve a Resolution Amending the FY23 Budget, BAF#23-115-A to Fund the Project and Grant the City Manager the Authority to Adjust Account Lines with the Schedule of Values. Authorize the City Manager to Approve a Task Order in a form acceptable to the City Attorney & Purchase Order to W&J Construction Corporation for the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) of $1,889,004. Approve a Contingency Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to issue Owner Directed Change Orders not to exceed $80,000.

September 12, 2023

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Finance Connection

Notable money activity
$163,507across 20 reported contributions
Trace money trail →
CandidateDonorAmountIndustryDate
Cory Briggs for City Attorney 2020Cory J. Briggs$35,000AttorneyJan 2020
Webb for City Attorney 2021Michael Webb$28,000City AttorneyApr 2025
Webb for City Attorney 2021Michael Webb$25,657City AttorneyApr 2025
Ford for City Attorney 2025Joseph Ford$5,500Self-employedJul 2024
Ford for City Attorney 2025Joseph Ford$5,500Self-employedJul 2024
Ford for City Attorney 2025Sarah Ford$5,500AttorneyJul 2024
Ford for City Attorney 2025Sarah Ford$5,500AttorneyJul 2024
Steve Colin 4 City AttorneySteve Colin$5,200AttorneyFeb 2025
Steve Colin 4 City AttorneySteve Colin$5,200AttorneyFeb 2025
Webb for City Attorney 2021Michael Webb$5,000City AttorneyJan 2021
Webb for City Attorney 2021Katnik Corporation$4,900-Jan 2021
Webb for City Attorney 2021Philip Keenan$4,900Owner/Retired Police SergeantFeb 2021
Webb for City Attorney 2021Mohammad Pournamdari$4,900Chief Financial OfficerFeb 2021
Webb for City Attorney 2021Michelle Katnik$4,900NoneJan 2021
Webb for City Attorney 2021Michel & Associates, P.C$4,900-Jan 2021
Webb for City Attorney 2021Linda Wenglikowski$3,450HomemakerFeb 2021
Webb for City Attorney 2021Jane Centofante$2,500HomemakerFeb 2021
Ford for City Attorney 2025California Teamsters PAC Local 911$2,500-Mar 2025
Webb for City Attorney 2021Phil Toomey$2,500LawyerJan 2021
Harden Sooper for City Attorney 2021Deborah Korman$2,000RetiredDec 2020

Reported financial relationships and timing signals. This does not prove motive or influence. Readers draw their own conclusions.

The Frame

What this does

This action commits $1,969,004 in city funds toward a construction project and grants the City Manager authority to manage the contract, budget adjustments, and change orders through November 2025.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

W&J Construction Corporation

The company is awarded the contract for construction management services.

City Manager

The City Manager is granted authority to execute contracts, approve task orders, and adjust budget lines.

What changed

Last recorded activity September 12, 2023.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The City Council is authorizing a contract with W&J Construction Corporation for construction management services using an existing Brevard County agreement. The project includes a guaranteed maximum price of $1,889,004 and an additional $80,000 contingency fund for change orders.

Key Facts

  • The city is entering a 'piggy-back' agreement with W&J Construction Corporation based on Brevard County contract RFQ 6-22-05.
  • The contract term is effective through November 21, 2025.
  • The Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) for the project is set at $1,889,004.
  • A contingency fund of $80,000 is authorized for owner-directed change orders.
  • The City Manager is authorized to execute the agreement, task orders, and purchase orders.
  • The City Manager is authorized to adjust account lines within the Schedule of Values.
  • The FY23 budget is being amended via BAF#23-115-A to fund the project.
  • The City Attorney must review and approve the final form of the contract and all related documents.

Why It Matters

This action commits $1,969,004 in city funds toward a construction project and grants the City Manager authority to manage the contract, budget adjustments, and change orders through November 2025.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a 'piggy-back' agreement?
It is a procurement method where the city utilizes an existing contract already competitively bid and awarded by another government agency (in this case, Brevard County) to avoid duplicating the bidding process.
What does 'Construction Manager at Risk' mean?
It is a project delivery method where the construction manager commits to deliver the project within a , assuming the risk for cost overruns.
Can the cost of this project increase?
The base price is capped at $1,889,004, but the City Manager is authorized to issue change orders up to an additional $80,000.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Use of External Procurement

The city is utilizing a Brevard County contract to bypass a local bidding process for a $1.89 million project.

Connected Entities

organizationW&J Construction CorporationThe construction management firm selected for the project.Map →
personCity ManagerAuthorized to execute the agreement, approve task orders, and adjust budget lineMap →
locationBrevard CountyThe entity whose existing contract (RFQ 6-22-05) is being utilized for this 'pigMap →
personCity AttorneyResponsible for finalizing and approving the form of the contract.Map →

Sources

Open source document

webapi.legistar.com

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record