POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Hearings on the Equal Access to Justice Act of 1979 (S. 265)

Original title: Equal Access to Justice Act of 1979, S. 265: hearings before the Subcommittee on Improvements in Judicial Machinery of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-sixth Congress, first session, on S. 265, April 19, 20, and 21, 1979.

Record date · July 20, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document records the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee hearings held in April 1979 regarding S. 265, a bill proposed to allow private citizens and small businesses to recover attorney fees when they prevail in lawsuits against the federal government.

Why it matters

The bill aims to change the financial risk for individuals and small entities challenging federal agency actions by potentially shifting the burden of legal costs to the government if the private party wins.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Private citizens and small businesses

They would be eligible to recover legal fees if they prevail in litigation against federal agencies.

Directly affected

Federal government agencies

They would be required to pay the legal fees of prevailing private parties in certain civil litigation cases.

Key Facts

  • The hearings were held to evaluate S. 265, the Equal Access to Justice Act of 1979.
  • The hearings took place over three days: April 19, 20, and 21, 1979.
  • The proceedings were conducted by the Subcommittee on Improvements in Judicial Machinery of the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary.
  • The legislation addresses the recovery of attorney fees in civil actions involving the United States government.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of S. 265?
The bill proposes allowing private parties to recover legal fees when they win lawsuits against the federal government.
Who conducted these hearings?
The hearings were conducted by the , part of the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Fee-shifting legislation

The hearings mark a formal attempt to codify the ability of private parties to recover costs from the government, moving away from the traditional 'American Rule' where each side pays their own fees.

Connected Entities

Subcommittee on Improvements in Judicial Machinery, Committee on the Judiciary
OrganizationSubcommittee on Improvements in Judicial Machinery“The Senate subcommittee responsible for conducting the hearings.”Map →
OrganizationCommittee on the Judiciary“The parent committee of the subcommittee.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record