POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Oversight Review of the U.S. Navy's Littoral Combat Ship Program

Original title: [H.A.S.C. 114-145]OVERSIGHT REVIEW OF THE U.S. NAVY'S LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP PROGRAM

January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing examines the effectiveness and future direction of a major naval shipbuilding program intended to replace aging and frigates, directly impacting federal defense spending and national maritime capabilities.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. Navy

The Navy is responsible for the acquisition, development, and operation of the Littoral Combat Ship fleet.

Department of Defense

The DOD oversees the acquisition programs and testing protocols for naval assets.

Taxpayers

Taxpayers fund the procurement and maintenance of naval vessels through federal appropriations.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2016 House Armed Services Subcommittee hearing regarding the status, challenges, and future of the U.S. Navy's program. The committee reviewed lessons learned from past issues, including cost and schedule growth caused by immature technology and unstable design requirements.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on December 8, 2016, by the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.
  • The LCS program was intended to replace mine countermeasure ships, patrol craft, and Oliver Hazard Perry-class frigates.
  • Chairwoman Hartzler identified that the program suffered from cost and schedule growth due to the introduction of immature technologies.
  • The committee noted that awarding contracts without a stable design and using prescriptive government specifications contributed to program inefficiencies.
  • The hearing served as the final oversight event for the 114th Congress.
  • The subcommittee authorized non-subcommittee members of the full Armed Services Committee to participate in the hearing.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program?
The program is designed to provide a flexible naval platform to replace older , patrol craft, and frigates.
Why did the LCS program face cost and schedule issues?
According to the committee, issues arose from introducing immature technologies, lacking a stable design at the time of contract award, and using overly prescriptive government specifications.

Why It Matters

The hearing examines the effectiveness and future direction of a major naval shipbuilding program intended to replace aging and frigates, directly impacting federal defense spending and national maritime capabilities.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 2 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Shift in Acquisition Strategy

The hearing highlights a clear institutional lesson learned: the failure of 'skipping a generation' of technology development in favor of rapid acquisition.

Connected Entities

personVicky HartzlerChairwoman of the Subcommittee on Oversight and InvestigationsMap →
personJ. Michael GilmoreDirector, Operational Test and Evaluation, Department of DefenseMap →
personMichele MackinDirector, Acquisition and Sourcing Management, GAOMap →
organizationHouse Committee on Armed ServicesCongressional committee conducting the oversightMap →
personThomas S. RowdenVADM, Commander, Naval Surface ForcesMap →
personJackie SpeierRanking Member of the SubcommitteeMap →
personRonald O'RourkeSpecialist in Naval Affairs, Congressional Research ServiceMap →
personSean J. StackleyAssistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development, and AcquisitionMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record