Legislative Hearing on Mining Restrictions in Superior National Forest
May 11, 2023
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The outcome of these proposals will determine whether mining operations can proceed on 225,504 acres of federal land in Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis counties, directly impacting local land use and mineral development rights.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Mining companies with existing leases
These entities would have their previously held leases and permits reinstated if H.R. 3195 is enacted.
Residents of Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis counties
Local land use and potential economic activity related to mining operations in the Superior National Forest are subject to change based on these legislative actions.
Last recorded activity May 11, 2023.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- H. Con. Res. 34 expresses formal disapproval of the Secretary of the Interior's withdrawal of 225,504 acres of land from mineral and geothermal leasing.
- The affected lands are located in Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis counties, Minnesota.
- H.R. 3195, titled the 'Superior National Forest Restoration Act,' proposes to rescind Public Land Order 7917.
- H.R. 3195 aims to reinstate mineral leases and permits previously held in the Superior National Forest.
- H.R. 3195 includes provisions to mandate a timely review process for mine plans of operations.
Why It Matters
The outcome of these proposals will determine whether mining operations can proceed on 225,504 acres of federal land in Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis counties, directly impacting local land use and mineral development rights.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the goal of H.R. 3195?
Which counties in Minnesota are affected by these proposals?
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Reversal of Land Withdrawal
The legislation represents a direct legislative attempt to override a recent executive branch decision (Public Land Order 7917) regarding land use.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy75Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools