The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.1972 Senate Hearing on D.C. Council Appointments and Pay
Record date · July 20, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This document is a transcript of a 1972 U.S. Senate hearing regarding the of three individuals to the District of Columbia Council and a proposed bill to increase the for Council members.
The hearing addressed the leadership composition of the D.C. Council and proposed a salary adjustment for its members, impacting the administrative structure and operational costs of the local government.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Rockwood H. Foster
He was a nominee for a position on the District of Columbia Council.
Jerry A. Moore, Jr.
He was a nominee for a position on the District of Columbia Council.
Marjorie H. Parker
She was a nominee for a position on the District of Columbia Council.
District of Columbia Council members
The proposed bill S. 3593 would change the compensation levels for these individuals.
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on September 25, 1972, during the 92nd Congress.
- The committee reviewed the nominations of Rockwood H. Foster, Jerry A. Moore, Jr., and Marjorie H. Parker for the D.C. Council.
- The committee considered S. 3593, a bill intended to raise the salary of D.C. Council members.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who were the nominees discussed in this hearing?
What was the purpose of S. 3593?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Historical D.C. Governance
The document highlights the federal oversight role the U.S. Senate held over D.C. Council appointments and compensation in 1972.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
