POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Hearing on Defense Health Agency Budget and Structure

Original title: [H.A.S.C. No. 114-97] DEFENSE HEALTH AGENCY: BUDGETING AND STRUCTURE

January 1, 2016

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing addresses potential changes to fees and the structure of military healthcare, which directly impacts the out-of-pocket costs and access to medical services for active-duty families and military retirees.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Active-duty military families

They face potential increases in TRICARE fees and cost-sharing requirements under the proposed 2017 budget reforms.

Military retirees

They are subject to proposed changes in TRICARE fee structures and cost-sharing obligations.

Department of Defense

The agency is responsible for implementing DHA structural changes and managing the proposed TRICARE budget reforms.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Subcommittee on Military Personnel held a hearing to review the Defense Health Agency's () performance, cost-saving initiatives, and proposed 2017 budget reforms for the health program. Lawmakers questioned the effectiveness of shared services in reducing costs and expressed concerns regarding proposed fee increases for military families and retirees.

Key Facts

  • The Defense Health Agency (DHA) was established in October 2013 to integrate clinical and business processes across the Department of Defense.
  • The DHA was tasked with creating shared services to eliminate redundant functions across military medical services.
  • The Department of Defense proposed reforms to TRICARE in the fiscal year 2017 budget.
  • Proposed reforms include increases to TRICARE fees and cost-sharing for active-duty family members and retirees.
  • The subcommittee is investigating the actual cost savings generated by the DHA since its 2013 inception.
  • The hearing examined the DHA's role in maintaining medical readiness for combatant commands.
  • Lawmakers questioned whether proposed reforms would improve access to care or reduce the complexity of the referral process.

Why It Matters

The hearing addresses potential changes to fees and the structure of military healthcare, which directly impacts the out-of-pocket costs and access to medical services for active-duty families and military retirees.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Defense Health Agency?
The is the organization established in 2013 to manage the Military Health System and integrate medical services across the Army, Navy, and Air Force.
Why are TRICARE fees being discussed?
The Department of Defense proposed changes in the 2017 budget that include increasing fees and cost-sharing for military families and retirees to reduce the overall cost of the defense health program.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Consolidation of Military Health Services

The document highlights a shift toward centralizing medical management under the DHA to reduce redundancy, a process that began in 2013.

Connected Entities

personJoseph J. HeckChairman of the Subcommittee on Military PersonnelMap →
organizationDefense Health AgencyThe agency responsible for managing the Military Health SystemMap →
personJonathan WoodsonAssistant Secretary of Defense for Health AffairsMap →
personSusan A. DavisRanking Member of the Subcommittee on Military PersonnelMap →
otherTRICAREThe military health insurance programMap →
personRaquel C. BonoVice Admiral, Director of the Defense Health AgencyMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record