POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

New Jersey Bill Repeals Municipal Public Defender Application Fees

Original title: Removes municipal authority to charge application fee for representation by municipal public defender.

Last action · January 13, 2026: Introduced, Referred to Assembly Judiciary CommitteeSponsors: Gary Schaer and 7 others

Companion · S 1670same policy, Senate version
Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

New Jersey municipalities are prohibited from charging an application fee of up to $200 for representation by a , effective immediately upon enactment.

Why it matters

Eliminates the statutory authority allowing local governments to collect application fees from individuals seeking publicly provided legal defense in municipal courts.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Individuals applying for representation by a municipal public defender

Directly affected

New Jersey municipalities

Municipalities lose the statutory authority to impose and collect application fees for municipal public defender services.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can New Jersey towns still charge an application fee for a public defender?
No, this bill repeals the statutory authority that allowed municipalities to impose an application fee of up to $200.
When does this change take effect?
The act takes effect immediately upon enactment.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced, Referred to Assembly Judiciary Committee

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Shama A. Haider, Verlina Reynolds-Jackson, Gary S. Schaer and 6 more
PersonShama A. Haider“Assemblywoman, co-sponsor”Map →
PersonVerlina Reynolds-Jackson“Assemblywoman, co-sponsor”Map →
PersonGary S. Schaer“Assemblyman, District 36”Map →
PersonChigozie U. Onyema“Assemblyman, District 28”Map →
PersonEllen J. Park“Assemblywoman, District 37”Map →
PersonKenyatta Stewart“Assemblyman, co-sponsor”Map →
PersonWilliam B. Sampson IV“Assemblyman, co-sponsor”Map →
OrganizationAssembly Judiciary Committee“Legislative committee of referral”Map →
PersonKatie Brennan“Assemblywoman, District 32”Map →

Sources

Open source document

njleg.state.nj.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance55
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record