Shama Haider

The 30-second read · every claim links to its source

Latest coverage: “Proyecto Ley pretende prohibir la venta de chicles en un estado demócrata donde los consideran…” (La Opinión, Oct 25, 2026). coverage, lean labeled ↗
Serves as State Assemblymember (New Jersey) since Jan 2022. github.com ↗

What we don’t cover yet 1 gaps

What we don’t cover yet

Campaign finance filings for this office aren’t wired in yet - when they’re sourced, they’ll appear here.

Personal finances

official financial-disclosure filings - originals one click away

View timeline Compare

Official personal financial-disclosure records are available in the comparison experience, with each figure linked to its filing.

← Back to overview

Political placement

third-party academic estimates - never our verdict

Left–right estimates (academic)

Shor-McCarty · votesVery Liberal

More liberal than 71% of New Jersey General Assembly members

Details

Score−1.11 on a −2.5 to +2.5 scale

BasisFrom roll-call votes

Party median0.02 more conservative than the Democratic median in this group (−1.13)

Compared with291 members of New Jersey General Assembly members (1996–2022)

Covers2022

● This person Democrats (156) Republicans (134)Thick bar: middle half · thin line: middle 80%

Shor, Boris. 2025. "Individual State Legislator Shor-McCarty Ideology Data, January 2025 Update." Harvard Dataverse, V1. Method: Shor, Boris, and Nolan McCarty. 2011. "The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures." American Political Science Review 105(3). Shor-McCarty ↗

DIME CFscore · donorsLiberal

More liberal than 89% of 2022 New Jersey General Assembly candidates

Details

Score−0.87 on a −2.5 to +2.5 scale

BasisFrom campaign donors

Party median0.24 more liberal than the Democratic median in this group (−0.63)

Compared with122 members of 2022 New Jersey General Assembly candidates

Covers2022

● This person Democrats (75) Republicans (47)Thick bar: middle half · thin line: middle 80%

Bonica, Adam. 2024. Database on Ideology, Money in Politics, and Elections: Public version 4.0. Stanford University Libraries. https://data.stanford.edu/dime DIME CFscore ↗

About these scores

These are third-party academic estimates of one left–right dimension, computed by researchers from roll-call votes or campaign donors. They are not Poliscope’s judgment. Each source uses its own scale, so compare people within a source rather than across sources.

← Back to overview