POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofFalse Claims Act →
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on the False Claims Act

Original title: OVERSIGHT OF THE FALSE CLAIMS ACT

January 1, 2016

False Claims ActFraudOversightJudiciaryLegal Reform

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The is the primary federal tool for recovering taxpayer money lost to fraud; this hearing examined how the law is applied and whether its enforcement mechanisms require legislative adjustment.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Taxpayers

Taxpayers are affected by the recovery of funds lost to fraud through the False Claims Act.

Healthcare Providers

Healthcare entities are frequently subject to False Claims Act investigations and litigation.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is the official record of a 2016 House Judiciary Subcommittee hearing regarding the and effectiveness of the . The hearing included testimony from legal experts, healthcare executives, and fraud prevention advocates.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on April 28, 2016, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
  • The Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice conducted the oversight hearing.
  • The hearing record includes testimony from four primary witnesses representing healthcare, academia, and legal advocacy groups.
  • The record includes supplemental materials such as fraud statistics from the U.S. Department of Justice and OIG criteria for exclusion authority.
  • The hearing was held during the second session of the 114th Congress.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the False Claims Act?
It is a federal law that allows the government to recover money from individuals or companies that defraud government programs.
Why was this hearing held?
The Subcommittee held the hearing to conduct , meaning they were reviewing how the law is currently working and if any changes are needed.

Why It Matters

The is the primary federal tool for recovering taxpayer money lost to fraud; this hearing examined how the law is applied and whether its enforcement mechanisms require legislative adjustment.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 2 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference90% confidence

Bicameral Interest

The inclusion of a statement from Senator Chuck Grassley indicates that the Senate Judiciary Committee was actively coordinating or aligning with the House Subcommittee on this oversight topic.

Chuck Grassley

Connected Entities

personSteve Cohen“Ranking Member of the Subcommittee”Map →
personTrent Franks“Chairman of the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice”Map →
personDennis E. Burke“President & CEO of Good Shepherd Health Care System”Map →
personChuck Grassley“U.S. Senator and Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee”Map →
personLarry D. Thompson“Professor at University of Georgia School of Law”Map →
personNeil V. Getnick“Chairman of Taxpayers Against Fraud Education Fund”Map →
personJonathan L. Diesenhaus“Partner at Hogan Lovells US LLP”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record