POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Kansas requires electric public utilities to pay landowner attorney fees when appeal results in higher award

Original title: AN ACT concerning electric public utilities; relating to eminent domain; requiring an electric public utility to pay a landowner's attorney fees when a party appeals the award of the court appointed appraisers and the landowner prevails; amending K.S.A. 26-509 and repealing the existing section.

Last action · April 10, 2026: Died in Committee

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Electric public utilities in Kansas must now pay a landowner's attorney fees if either party appeals a court-appointed appraiser's award and the final jury or master verdict exceeds that initial award.

Why it matters

Shifts legal cost burdens from landowners to electric utilities in successful appeals involving utility land acquisitions.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

electric public utilities

Electric public utilities are required to pay landowner attorney fees as court costs when an appeal results in a verdict higher than the initial appraisers' award.

Directly affected

landowners

Landowners involved in eminent domain appeals against electric utilities are entitled to have their attorney fees paid by the utility if the final verdict exceeds the appraisers' award.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

When does an electric public utility have to pay a landowner's attorney fees under this bill?
An electric utility must pay the landowner's attorney fees whenever the utility or the landowner appeals the court-appointed and the final jury or master verdict is greater than that initial award.
Does this requirement apply to all types of condemnations?
No, this specific mandatory provision applies when the plaintiff is an electric public utility.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

5 actions
  1. Apr 10, 2026Senate
    Died in Committee
  2. Jan 30, 2025Senate
    Hearing: Thursday, January 30, 2025, 10:30 AM — Room 346-S
  3. Jan 29, 2025Senate
    Hearing: Wednesday, January 29, 2025, 10:30 AM — Room 346-S
  4. Jan 23, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to Senate Committee on Judiciary
  5. Jan 22, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Mandatory vs. Discretionary Attorney Fees

The bill shifts the award of attorney fees from discretionary ('may allow') to mandatory ('shall allow') specifically when the condemner is an electric public utility.

Connected Entities

Senate Committee on Judiciary
OrganizationSenate Committee on Judiciary“Legislative committee sponsor of SB 61”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.kslegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 45)
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record