Payment Authorization for Legal Services in Police Arbitration
April 28, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This resolution authorizes the expenditure of $17,850 in city funds to cover professional fees related to labor contract negotiations between the City of Pittsburgh and the police union.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Foster & Foster
The firm is the recipient of the authorized payment for services rendered.
City of Pittsburgh taxpayers
City funds are being allocated to cover the costs of the arbitration process.
Fraternal Order of Police
The union is a party to the arbitration process for which these legal services were required.
Last recorded activity April 28, 2026.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The City of Pittsburgh is authorized to pay Foster & Foster up to $17,850.00.
- The payment is for professional services rendered during Act 111 Interest Arbitration.
- The arbitration involved the City of Pittsburgh and the Fraternal Order of Police.
- The payment covers a one-year period.
- The resolution (File 2026-0362) has passed finally.
- An executive session regarding this matter was held on April 16, 2026.
- The resolution was introduced on April 10, 2026.
- The resolution was processed through the Committee on Finance and Law.
Why It Matters
This resolution authorizes the expenditure of $17,850 in city funds to cover professional fees related to labor contract negotiations between the City of Pittsburgh and the police union.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this payment for?
How much will the city pay?
News Coverage
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Arbitration Timeline
The resolution was introduced on April 10, 2026, and an executive session was held on April 16, 2026, indicating a rapid progression through the committee process.
Connected Entities
Sources
webapi.legistar.com
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance30How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools