Payment Authorization for PFM Group Consulting LLC
May 6, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This resolution authorizes the expenditure of $90,588.24 in city funds to cover consulting costs related to the process with the police union.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
PFM Group Consulting LLC
The firm is the recipient of the authorized payment for services rendered.
City of Pittsburgh taxpayers
City funds are being allocated to cover the costs of the arbitration consulting services.
Fraternal Order of Police
The union is a party to the arbitration process for which these consulting services were required.
Last recorded activity May 6, 2026.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The City of Pittsburgh is authorized to pay PFM Group Consulting LLC a maximum of $90,588.24.
- The payment is for professional services rendered during Act 111 Interest Arbitration.
- The arbitration involved the City of Pittsburgh and the Fraternal Order of Police.
- The payment covers a one-year period.
- The resolution (File 2026-0383) has passed finally.
- An executive session regarding this matter was held on April 20, 2026.
- The resolution was introduced on April 17, 2026.
- The matter was reviewed by the Committee on Public Safety and Wellness.
Why It Matters
This resolution authorizes the expenditure of $90,588.24 in city funds to cover consulting costs related to the process with the police union.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this payment for?
How much is the city paying?
News Coverage
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Arbitration Cost Management
The city is utilizing external consulting firms to manage the costs and complexities of Act 111 labor arbitrations.
Connected Entities
Sources
webapi.legistar.com
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance30How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools