POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

North Dakota bill modifies hunting distance restrictions and consent requirements near buildings

Original title: A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact section 20.1-01-21 of the North Dakota Century Code; relating to hunting near buildings, occupied structures, or storage structures.

Last action · January 27, 2025: Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 5 nays 42Sponsors: Schaible, Donald and 5 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Senate Bill 2168 prohibits individuals from hunting or pursuing game within 440 yards of any building, occupied structure, or storage structure on another person's property without the property owner's consent.

Why it matters

Property owners and hunters face altered rules regarding shooting distances and permission requirements near rural outbuildings and storage structures.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Hunters

Hunters must secure consent directly from property owners when operating within 440 yards of buildings and storage structures.

Directly affected

Property Owners

Property owners hold the explicit authority to grant or deny hunting consent near buildings and storage structures on their land.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Whose permission is required to hunt near a building under this bill?
Consent must be obtained from the property owner.
What is the specified distance restriction for hunting near structures?
Hunters must stay at least 440 yards, or 402.34 meters, away from any building, occupied structure, or storage structure.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Failed in the Senate.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Jan 27, 2025Senate
    Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 5 nays 42
  2. Jan 24, 2025SenateCommittee
    Reported back, do not pass, placed on calendar 7 0 0
  3. Jan 23, 2025SenateCommittee
    Committee Hearing 02:31
  4. Jan 10, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Introduced, first reading, referred Energy and Natural Resources Committee

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Mike Brandenburg, Dawson Holle, Randy Lemm and 4 more
PersonMike Brandenburg“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 2168”Map →
PersonDawson Holle“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 2168”Map →
PersonRandy Lemm“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 2168”Map →
PersonSchaible, Donald“Primary sponsor of Senate Bill 2168”Map →
PersonDori Hauck“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 2168”Map →
OrganizationNorth Dakota Century Code“State statutory code amended by the bill”Map →
PersonJanne Myrdal“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 2168”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 25)
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record