POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

1978 Senate Hearings on Nuclear Waste Management Authority

Original title: Nuclear waste management:hearings before the Subcommittee on Nuclear Regulation of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, Ninety-fifth Congress, second session, on S. 2761, a bill to delegate power to the states, through their state legislatures, to disapprove certain specified activities licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and for other purposes, S. 2804 a bill to expand the licensing and related authority of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for certain specified activities, and for other purposes, S. 3146 a bill to expand the jurisdiction of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission over nuclear waste storage and disposal facilities, and for other purposes, March 22, April 4, 5, June 14, and 20, 1978.

Record date · July 19, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document records a series of 1978 Senate hearings regarding three proposed bills that would alter the regulatory authority of the and state governments over nuclear waste storage and disposal. The hearings explored the balance of power between federal agencies and state legislatures in approving or disapproving nuclear activities.

Why it matters

These hearings established the legislative foundation for how nuclear waste facilities are licensed and the extent to which states can intervene in federal nuclear regulatory decisions.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

State Legislatures

The proposed legislation would grant these bodies the authority to disapprove specific nuclear activities licensed by the federal government.

Directly affected

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The proposed bills would either expand or limit the agency's jurisdiction and licensing authority over nuclear waste facilities.

Key Facts

  • The hearings took place on March 22, April 4, April 5, June 14, and June 20, 1978.
  • S. 2761 proposed delegating power to state legislatures to disapprove specific activities licensed by the NRC.
  • S. 2804 proposed expanding the licensing and regulatory authority of the NRC.
  • S. 3146 proposed expanding NRC jurisdiction to include nuclear waste storage and disposal facilities.
Show all 5 facts
  • The hearings were held by the Subcommittee on Nuclear Regulation of the Committee on Environment and Public Works during the 95th Congress.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the main purpose of these hearings?
The hearings were held to discuss three bills aimed at redefining the roles of the federal government and state governments in regulating nuclear waste storage and disposal.
Did these bills give states more power?
S. 2761 specifically proposed giving state legislatures the power to disapprove certain activities licensed by the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Federal-State Regulatory Balance

The hearings highlight a 1978 legislative effort to shift nuclear regulatory power from a purely federal model toward a model involving state-level oversight.

Connected Entities

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Subcommittee on Nuclear Regulation, Committee on Environment and Public Works
OrganizationNuclear Regulatory Commission“The federal agency whose authority was under review.”Map →
OrganizationSubcommittee on Nuclear Regulation“The Senate subcommittee conducting the hearings.”Map →
OrganizationCommittee on Environment and Public Works“The parent committee overseeing the subcommittee.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record