The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Approval of $2 Million Legal Services Contract for County Infrastructure Projects
Record date · June 19, 2018
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This resolution authorizes a $2 million contract with Ashurst LLP to provide legal services for public-private partnerships related to the development of county civil and criminal court facilities. The contract covers an initial two-year term with two one-year renewal options.
The county is committing up to $2 million in taxpayer funds for specialized legal counsel to manage the development of court facilities through private partnerships.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Ashurst LLP
The firm is the recipient of the legal services contract.
County Attorney’s Office
The office is granted sole authority to issue work orders under the contract.
County Taxpayers
Taxpayer funds are being used to pay for the legal services contract.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of this contract?
Who is authorized to order work under this contract?
How long does this contract last?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Reference to File 161075
The document explicitly references a previous item (File 161075), suggesting this is part of a larger or ongoing legislative process regarding court facility development.
Connected Entities
Sources
webapi.legistar.com
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
