The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Kansas bill limits arrest summonses to misdemeanors and bans own-recognizance release after FTA warrants
Last action · April 10, 2026: Died in Senate Committee
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
A failed Kansas bill would have prohibited issuing a instead of an arrest warrant for felony charges and required that any bond set on a warrant after a failure to appear in response to a summons forbid release on the defendant's own recognizance. The measure also outlined procedures for public disclosure and magistrate of affidavits.
Defendants facing arrest warrants for missing a court would have lost the option of personal-recognizance release, requiring financial bail or detention while awaiting court appearances.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
defendants
law enforcement agencies
Law enforcement agencies receive access to supporting probable cause affidavits prior to executing warrants or summonses.
magistrates
Magistrates must evaluate public disclosure requests for affidavits within specific deadlines and apply mandatory redaction or sealing rules.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Could a judge still issue a summons for a felony charge under this bill?
What happens if someone misses a court date after receiving a summons?
Are probable cause affidavits always hidden from the public?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died in committee.
Procedural history
11 actions- Apr 10, 2026SenateDied in Senate Committee
- Mar 3, 2026SenateHearing: Tuesday, March 3, 2026, 10:30 AM — Room 346-S
- Feb 19, 2026SenateCommitteeReferred to Senate Committee on Judiciary
- Feb 18, 2026HouseFloorFinal Action - Passed
- Feb 18, 2026SenateIntroducedReceived and Introduced
- Feb 17, 2026HouseCommittee of the Whole - Now working on
Show 5 earlier actions
- Feb 17, 2026HouseFloorCommittee of the Whole - Be passed
- Feb 10, 2026HouseFloorCommittee Report recommending bill be passed by
- Feb 3, 2026HouseHearing: Tuesday, February 3, 2026, 3:30 PM — Room 582-N
- Feb 2, 2026HouseIntroducedIntroduced
- Feb 2, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to House Committee on Judiciary
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sources
www.kslegislature.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 45)
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
