POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

House Subcommittee Hearing on Federal Lands Legislation

Original title: H.R. 386; H.R. 1318; H.R. 2717; H.R. 3448; AND H.R. 4377

Record date · January 1, 2023

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The House on Federal Lands held a hearing on July 13, 2023, to discuss five separate bills (H.R. 386, H.R. 1318, H.R. 2717, H.R. 3448, and H.R. 4377). The hearing included testimony from government officials and private stakeholders regarding the management of federal lands, historic sites, and military-related land use.

Why it matters

This hearing serves as a formal legislative step for five bills that could impact the management, designation, or use of specific federal lands and historic monuments across the United States.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

National Park Service

The agency provides testimony on how the proposed legislation impacts the management of federal lands and historic sites.

Directly affected

U.S. Air Force

The agency provides input on how the proposed legislation affects military installations and land use.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on July 13, 2023, before the Subcommittee on Federal Lands.
  • The committee reviewed five specific bills: H.R. 386, H.R. 1318, H.R. 2717, H.R. 3448, and H.R. 4377.
  • Testimony was provided by representatives from the U.S. Air Force and the National Park Service.
  • Private sector and state-level witnesses included representatives from the Fort Ticonderoga Association, the American Battlefield Trust, and the Women's Suffrage National Monument Foundation.
Show all 7 facts
  • The Bureau of Land Management submitted a statement for the record regarding H.R. 4377.
  • The U.S. Marine Corps submitted a letter of support for H.R. 4377.
  • Multiple historians and foundations submitted letters of support for H.R. 1318.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to gather testimony and information on five specific pieces of legislation related to federal lands and historic sites.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included officials from the Air Force and National Park Service, as well as representatives from historical foundations and state government.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference90% confidence

High volume of support for H.R. 1318

The hearing record includes a notable number of letters of support from historians and foundations specifically for H.R. 1318.

Connected Entities

Tom Tiffany, Mike Reynolds, Ravi I. Chaudhary and 1 more
PersonTom Tiffany“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Federal Lands”Map →
PersonMike Reynolds“Deputy Director of the National Park Service”Map →
PersonRavi I. Chaudhary“Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Energy, Installations, and Environment”Map →
PersonJoe Neguse“Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Federal Lands”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record