The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Proposed $5.75 Million Grant for Maternal and Newborn Health Programs Withdrawn
Record date · March 25, 2025
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This ordinance proposed accepting $5.75 million in federal grant funds to reduce newborn emergency room visits and postpartum depression through the Jacksonville Housing Authority (KHA). The legislation was withdrawn by the City Council on March 25, 2025, effectively ending the proposal.
The withdrawal of this ordinance means the city will not receive the $5.75 million in federal grant funds intended for maternal and newborn health initiatives, and the proposed partnership with the Institute for Child Success and the Riley Institute will not proceed.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Jacksonville Housing Authority (KHA)
The agency was designated to oversee the program and manage the proposed contracts.
Institute for Child Success
The organization was named as a proposed service provider for the program.
Riley Institute
The organization was named as a proposed service provider for the program.
Key Facts
- The ordinance was officially withdrawn by the City Council on March 25, 2025, with a 17-0 vote.
- The proposal sought to appropriate $5,750,000 in federal SIPPRA grant funds.
- The funds were intended to reduce newborn emergency room visits and postpartum depression.
- The ordinance included a request to waive competitive procurement requirements for the Institute for Child Success and the Riley Institute.
Show all 7 facts
- The legislation proposed authorizing the Mayor and KHA CEO to execute contracts with the aforementioned institutes.
- The ordinance proposed the creation of a new position to support the program.
- The proposal was introduced on February 11, 2025, and underwent multiple committee reviews before being withdrawn.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is this program still going forward?
What was the purpose of the $5.75 million?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Withdrawn.
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Unanimous Withdrawal
The ordinance was withdrawn by a unanimous 17-0 vote, indicating a complete lack of support or a change in strategy by the City Council.
Connected Entities
Sources
webapi.legistar.com
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
