POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

House Armed Services Committee Hearing: DOD COVID-19 Response

Original title: [H.A.S.C. No. 116-84]DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE COVID-19 RESPONSE TO DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL BASE CHALLENGES

January 1, 2021

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing provides oversight on how the Department of Defense managed supply chain and industrial base disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, which impacted national security production timelines and contractor operations.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Department of Defense

The agency was required to report on its industrial base management strategies during the pandemic.

Defense Contractors

These entities faced operational challenges and supply chain disruptions addressed during the hearing.

House Armed Services Committee Members

Members had to adapt to new hybrid hearing protocols for participation and voting.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2021.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is the transcript of a June 2020 House Armed Services Committee hearing regarding the Department of Defense's response to challenges faced by the during the COVID-19 pandemic. It also serves as the record for the committee's first , establishing new protocols for remote participation.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on June 10, 2020, in the Longworth House Office Building.
  • This session marked the first hybrid hearing conducted by the House Armed Services Committee, allowing for both in-person and remote participation.
  • The hearing focused on the impact of COVID-19 on the defense industrial base.
  • Remote members were required to remain visible on screen for identity verification and quorum purposes.
  • Remote members were instructed to keep video functions on and mute microphones when not speaking to ensure technical stability.
  • The record includes prepared statements from Ellen M. Lord, Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment.
  • The record includes a letter from Governor Jay Inslee to Vice President Mike Pence.
  • The record includes post-hearing responses to questions from various committee members including Mr. Brindisi, Mr. Cisneros, Mrs. Davis, Ms. Houlahan, and Mr. Smith.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the primary purpose of this hearing?
The committee met to examine how the Department of Defense was addressing challenges to the caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
What new procedures were introduced at this meeting?
This was the committee's first , requiring specific protocols for remote member participation, including video visibility and microphone management.

Why It Matters

The hearing provides oversight on how the Department of Defense managed supply chain and industrial base disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, which impacted national security production timelines and contractor operations.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Adoption of Hybrid Legislative Procedures

The document captures the formal transition of the House Armed Services Committee to hybrid meeting formats in response to COVID-19 social distancing requirements.

Connected Entities

personWilliam M. ThornberryRanking Member of the CommitteeMap →
personEllen M. LordUnder Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and SustainmentMap →
organizationHouse Committee on Armed ServicesCongressional committee conducting the hearingMap →
personJay InsleeGovernor of Washington, submitted a letter for the recordMap →
personAdam SmithChairman of the House Armed Services CommitteeMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record