Changes to Uterine Fibroid Research Database Privacy Rules
November 4, 2025
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Currently Ordered engrossed, then enrolled. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Signed.
Procedural history
20 actions- Feb 26, 2026HouseBill added to Special Order Calendar (3/3/2026)
- Jan 27, 2026HouseAdded to Second Reading Calendar
- Jan 27, 2026HouseBill released to House Calendar
- Jan 27, 2026HouseReported out of Health & Human Services Committee
- Jan 27, 2026HouseCommitteeFavorable by Health & Human Services Committee
- Jan 23, 2026HouseAdded to Health & Human Services Committee agenda
Show 14 earlier actions
- Jan 20, 2026HouseNow in Health & Human Services Committee
- Jan 20, 2026HouseReported out of Health Care Budget Subcommittee
- Jan 20, 2026HouseCommitteeFavorable by Health Care Budget Subcommittee
- Jan 15, 2026HouseAdded to Health Care Budget Subcommittee agenda
- Jan 15, 2026HouseNow in Health Care Budget Subcommittee
- Jan 15, 2026HouseReported out of Health Professions & Programs Subcommittee
- Jan 14, 2026HouseCommitteeFavorable by Health Professions & Programs Subcommittee
- Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
- Jan 12, 2026HouseAdded to Health Professions & Programs Subcommittee agenda
- Nov 12, 2025HouseNow in Health Professions & Programs Subcommittee
- Nov 12, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to Health & Human Services Committee
- Nov 12, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to Health Care Budget Subcommittee
- Nov 12, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to Health Professions & Programs Subcommittee
- Nov 4, 2025HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
This change alters the data collection standards for women diagnosed with or treated for uterine fibroids, potentially allowing for more detailed patient tracking in state research databases if the contingency bill is enacted.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Women diagnosed with or treated for uterine fibroids
Their personal identifying information may be included in the state research database if the bill becomes law.
Medical researchers
They may gain access to more detailed patient data for research purposes.
Current stage: Ordered engrossed, then enrolled.
Signed.
Background
- The Uterine Fibroid Research Database was established to collect data to improve public awareness and research outcomes regarding uterine fibroids. context
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Will my personal information be added to the database immediately?
What does this bill change regarding patient privacy?
Why It Matters
This change alters the data collection standards for women diagnosed with or treated for uterine fibroids, potentially allowing for more detailed patient tracking in state research databases if the contingency bill is enacted.
News Coverage
Voting Record
Favorable (Health & Human Services Committee)
Total
35
Yes
35
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (35)
Sam Greco
Republican · yes
Will Robinson
Republican · yes
Toby Overdorf
Republican · yes
J.J. Grow
Republican · yes
Demi Busatta
Republican · yes
Brian Hodgers
Republican · yes
Rob Long
Democratic · yes
Dianne Hart-Lowman
Democratic · yes
Robin Bartleman
Democratic · yes
Shane Abbott
Republican · yes
Robbie Brackett
Republican · yes
Dean Black
Republican · yes
Susan Plasencia
Republican · yes
Daryl Campbell
Democratic · yes
Toby Overdorf
Republican · yes
Susan Plasencia
Republican · yes
Alex Andrade
Republican · yes
Will Robinson
Republican · yes
Lauren Melo
Republican · yes
Dianne Hart-Lowman
Democratic · yes
Demi Busatta
Republican · yes
Adam Anderson
Republican · yes
Sam Greco
Republican · yes
Marie Woodson
Democratic · yes
+ 11 more
Favorable (Health Care Budget Subcommittee)
Total
16
Yes
13
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
3
Abstain
0
How they voted (16)
Kim Berfield
Republican · yes
Debra Tendrich
Democratic · yes
Jennifer Kincart Jonsson
Republican · yes
Karen Gonzalez Pittman
Republican · absent
Alex Andrade
Republican · yes
Allison Tant
Democratic · yes
Kaylee Tuck
Republican · yes
Marie Woodson
Democratic · yes
Chase Tramont
Republican · yes
Kim Berfield
Republican · yes
Adam Anderson
Republican · yes
Mike Redondo
Republican · yes
Dana Trabulsy
Republican · absent
Hillary Cassel
Republican · yes
Lauren Melo
Republican · absent
Mitch Rosenwald
Democratic · yes
Favorable (Health Professions & Programs Subcommittee)
Total
30
Yes
30
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (30)
Robbie Brackett
Republican · yes
Jessica Baker
Republican · yes
Tiffany Esposito
Republican · yes
Tae Edmonds
Democratic · yes
Randy Maggard
Republican · yes
Erika Booth
Republican · yes
Juan Porras
Republican · yes
Jason Shoaf
Republican · yes
J.J. Grow
Republican · yes
Rob Long
Democratic · yes
Wallace Aristide
Democratic · yes
Shane Abbott
Republican · yes
Erika Booth
Republican · yes
Jessica Baker
Republican · yes
Rob Long
Democratic · yes
Mike Redondo
Republican · yes
Randy Maggard
Republican · yes
Mitch Rosenwald
Democratic · yes
J.J. Grow
Republican · yes
Alex Rizo
Republican · yes
Christine Hunschofsky
Democratic · yes
Wallace Aristide
Democratic · yes
Shane Abbott
Republican · yes
Jason Shoaf
Republican · yes
+ 6 more
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Data Privacy Reversal
The bill explicitly removes a privacy protection that previously prohibited the collection of personal identifying information in a state health database.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools