Joint Congressional Hearing on South China Sea Maritime Disputes
January 1, 2017
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing serves as a formal record of U.S. government oversight and policy discussion regarding territorial tensions in the South China Sea, which impact international trade routes and regional security alliances.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
U.S. Department of Defense
The agency provided testimony regarding its strategic posture in the East Asia region.
U.S. Department of State
The agency provided testimony regarding diplomatic efforts related to maritime disputes.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on July 7, 2016, at 3:30 p.m. in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- The hearing was a joint session between the Subcommittee on Seapower and Projection Forces and the Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific.
- Abraham M. Denmark (Department of Defense) and Colin Willett (Department of State) provided testimony.
- The primary subject of the hearing was maritime disputes occurring in the South China Sea.
- The record includes prepared statements from committee members and witnesses, as well as post-hearing questions submitted by members of Congress.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at this hearing?
Why It Matters
The hearing serves as a formal record of U.S. government oversight and policy discussion regarding territorial tensions in the South China Sea, which impact international trade routes and regional security alliances.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Joint Committee Coordination
The hearing demonstrates formal coordination between the Armed Services and Foreign Affairs committees to address the intersection of military and diplomatic policy in the South China Sea.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools