POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Utah regulates automated driving system liability, caps noneconomic damages at $1 million, and shields developers from ordinary negligence claims

Original title: Autonomous Systems Amendments

Last action · March 23, 2026: Governor SignedSponsors: Kirk Cullimore and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Utah enacts the Autonomous Systems Amendments to govern product liability for automated driving systems, capping noneconomic damages at $1 million and driverless operation recoveries at $100,000. The law exempts manufacturers and developers from ordinary negligence claims, establishes product defect standards requiring proof that automated systems cause more aggregate injuries than human drivers, and provides state-of-the-art affirmative defenses. The statute takes effect on May 6, 2026.

Why it matters

The measure establishes specific statutory limits on financial recovery for individuals injured in crashes involving automated vehicles, while altering the legal liability standards applicable to software developers and vehicle manufacturers.

Background
  • State legislatures across the United States have increasingly enacted specialized legal and liability frameworks to address the commercial deployment of autonomous and automated driving vehicles. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Automated driving system manufacturers and developers

Manufacturers and developers are shielded from ordinary negligence claims and receive liability protections when meeting state-of-the-art standards or aggregate safety criteria.

Directly affected

Plaintiffs injured by automated driving systems

Individuals bringing claims face statutory caps on noneconomic losses and driverless operation recoveries, as well as specific evidentiary standards for product defect claims.

Directly affected

Registered owners and dispatchers of ADS vehicles

Registered owners and dispatchers can be subject to actions under driverless operation liability provisions when an ADS-equipped vehicle causes injury or property damage during driverless operation.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the maximum limit for noneconomic loss awards in automated vehicle cases?
The amount of the award for es in an action relating to an ADS-equipped or ADS-dedicated vehicle may not exceed $1,000,000, though this limit does not apply to wrongful death claims.
Can manufacturers of automated driving systems be sued for ordinary negligence?
No. Manufacturers or developers of level four or level five automated driving systems are not subject to liability under a theory of negligence for personal injury, death, or property damage while the ADS is engaged.
What must a plaintiff prove to establish liability under driverless operation provisions?
A plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the automated driving system was engaged at the time of the incident and was a proximate cause of the injury or property damage, without needing to prove negligence, breach of duty, or product defect.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

60 actions
  1. Mar 23, 2026Lieutenant Governor's office for filingEnrolled
    Governor Signed
  2. Mar 13, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to Governor
  3. Mar 13, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received enrolled bill from Printing
  4. Mar 12, 2026Senate
    Senate/ enrolled bill to Printing
  5. Mar 12, 2026Senate Secretary
    Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
  6. Mar 10, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
Show 54 earlier actions
  1. Mar 10, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Bill Received from Senate for Enrolling
  2. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ signed by President/ sent for enrolling
  3. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received from House
  4. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ to Senate
  5. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ signed by Speaker/ returned to Senate
  6. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ received from Senate
  7. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to House
  8. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ concurs with House amendment
  9. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ placed on Concurrence Calendar
  10. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received from House
  11. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ to Senate
  12. Mar 6, 2026HouseFloor
    House/ passed 3rd reading
  13. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ 3rd reading
  14. Mar 5, 2026House
    House/ Rules to 3rd Reading Calendar
  15. Mar 4, 2026House
    House/ 3rd Reading Calendar to Rules
  16. Mar 4, 2026House
    House/ 2nd reading
  17. Mar 4, 2026House
    House/ comm rpt/ substituted
  18. Mar 4, 2026House
    House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  19. Mar 4, 2026House
    House Comm - Substitute Recommendation
  20. Mar 4, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0292S02
  21. Mar 4, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0292S02
  22. Mar 4, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0292S02
  23. Mar 4, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0292S02
  24. Mar 3, 2026HouseCommittee
    House/ to standing committee
  25. Mar 3, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  26. Mar 3, 2026House
    House/ received from Senate
  27. Mar 2, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to House
  28. Mar 2, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 3rd reading
  29. Mar 2, 2026Senate
    Senate/ uncircled
  30. Mar 2, 2026Senate
    Senate/ circled
  31. Mar 2, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 3rd reading
  32. Feb 27, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 2nd reading
  33. Feb 27, 2026Senate
    Senate/ substituted
  34. Feb 27, 2026Senate
    Senate/ uncircled
  35. Feb 27, 2026Senate
    Senate/ circled
  36. Feb 27, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 2nd reading
  37. Feb 26, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0292S01
  38. Feb 26, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0292S01
  39. Feb 26, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0292S01
  40. Feb 26, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0292S01
  41. Feb 20, 2026Senate
    Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
  42. Feb 20, 2026Senate
    Senate/ committee report favorable
  43. Feb 20, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  44. Feb 18, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Not Considered
  45. Feb 17, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  46. Feb 17, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0292
  47. Feb 17, 2026SenateCommittee
    Senate/ to standing committee
  48. Feb 16, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0292
  49. Feb 13, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  50. Feb 13, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received bill from Legislative Research
  51. Feb 12, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0292
  52. Feb 12, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0292
  53. Feb 12, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  54. Feb 12, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Establishment of Specialized ADS Liability Framework

The legislation creates a distinct legal framework for automated driving systems, separating them from traditional product liability by imposing damages caps, barring ordinary negligence claims against developers, and establishing aggregate safety comparison standards.

Connected Entities

State Tax Commission, SAE International Standard J3016_202104, Motor Vehicle Division and 1 more
OrganizationState Tax Commission“defined in relation to commission definitions”Map →
otherSAE International Standard J3016_202104“taxonomy and definitions for driving automation systems”Map →
OrganizationMotor Vehicle Division“division of the commission created in Section 41-1a-106”Map →
OrganizationNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration“adopter of SAE International Standard J3016_202104”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record