POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Utah creates civil action and penalties for abusive website access lawsuits under the Americans with Disabilities Act

Original title: Disability Litigation Amendments

Last action · March 23, 2026: Governor SignedSponsors: Brady Brammer and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Utah law now allows defendants and the attorney general to sue filing parties for initiating abusive website access lawsuits under the Americans with Disabilities Act, establishing a sunset date of July 1, 2031, for these statutory provisions effective May 6, 2026.

Why it matters

Local business organizations and residents sued over website accessibility standards gain the legal right to seek attorney fees, costs, punitive damages, and sanctions if the court finds the original lawsuit was filed primarily for monetary payout rather than fixing accessibility.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

defending party

Residents and business organizations sued in website access lawsuits gain the right to bring an action against filing parties, seek damages, and benefit from a presumption of abuse if they cure violations.

Directly affected

filing party

Individuals, attorneys, and law firms initiating website access lawsuits face potential liability for attorney fees, punitive damages, and sanctions if their lawsuits are deemed abusive.

Directly affected

attorney general

The attorney general is explicitly authorized to bring an action on behalf of a defending party against a filing party who initiated an abusive website access lawsuit.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes a website access lawsuit considered abusive under this law?
A lawsuit is considered abusive if its primary purpose is to obtain monetary payment rather than to remedy a website access violation, as determined by a considering the totality of the circumstances.
Can the Attorney General act on behalf of a resident sued over website access?
Yes, the attorney general may bring an action on behalf of a against a who initiated an abusive website access lawsuit.
What happens if a business cures the website access violation after receiving notice?
There is a that the website access lawsuit is abusive if the attempted in good faith to cure the violation within 30 days or fully cured it within 90 days after receiving detailed written notice.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

37 actions
  1. Mar 23, 2026Lieutenant Governor's office for filingEnrolled
    Governor Signed
  2. Mar 13, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to Governor
  3. Mar 13, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received enrolled bill from Printing
  4. Mar 11, 2026Senate
    Senate/ enrolled bill to Printing
  5. Mar 11, 2026Senate Secretary
    Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
  6. Mar 2, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
Show 31 earlier actions
  1. Mar 2, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Bill Received from Senate for Enrolling
  2. Feb 26, 2026Senate
    Senate/ signed by President/ sent for enrolling
  3. Feb 26, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received from House
  4. Feb 26, 2026House
    House/ to Senate
  5. Feb 26, 2026House
    House/ signed by Speaker/ returned to Senate
  6. Feb 26, 2026HouseFloor
    House/ passed 3rd reading
  7. Feb 26, 2026House
    House/ 3rd reading
  8. Feb 25, 2026House
    House/ 2nd reading
  9. Feb 25, 2026House
    House/ committee report favorable
  10. Feb 25, 2026House
    House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  11. Feb 19, 2026HouseCommittee
    House/ to standing committee
  12. Feb 17, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  13. Feb 17, 2026House
    House/ received from Senate
  14. Feb 17, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to House
  15. Feb 17, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 3rd reading
  16. Feb 17, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 3rd reading
  17. Feb 13, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 2nd reading
  18. Feb 13, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 2nd reading
  19. Jan 29, 2026Senate
    Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
  20. Jan 29, 2026Senate
    Senate/ committee report favorable
  21. Jan 27, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  22. Jan 20, 2026SenateCommittee
    Senate/ to standing committee
  23. Jan 20, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  24. Jan 16, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  25. Jan 16, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0068
  26. Jan 16, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0068
  27. Jan 7, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received bill from Legislative Research
  28. Jan 2, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0068
  29. Jan 2, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0068
  30. Jan 2, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  31. Jan 2, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift99% confidence

Creation of Abusive Litigation Counter-Suit

The statute creates a specific statutory cause of action and remedies allowing defendants to counter-sue plaintiffs in website access lawsuits under defined conditions of abuse.

Connected Entities

Americans with Disabilities Act, Nelson T. Abbott, Brady Brammer
OrganizationAmericans with Disabilities Act“Federal accessibility standards referenced in the statute”Map →
PersonNelson T. Abbott“House Sponsor”Map →
PersonBrady Brammer“Chief Sponsor”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record