POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Congressional Hearing on Marketing Order Costs (H.R. 13193)

Original title: Marketing order costs: hearings before the Subcommittee on Domestic Marketing and Consumer Relations of the Committee on Agriculture, House of Representatives, Ninety-first Congress, first session, on H.R. 13193.

Record date · July 20, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is a transcript of a 1969 congressional hearing held by the House on Domestic Marketing and Consumer Relations. The hearing focused on the costs associated with federal agricultural s as proposed in H.R. 13193.

Why it matters

The hearing examines the financial and regulatory impact of federal s on agricultural producers and consumers, which dictate quality standards and supply management for specific commodities.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Agricultural producers

Producers are subject to the quality and supply regulations established by federal marketing orders.

Indirectly affected

Consumers

Consumers are affected by the market prices and availability of agricultural products regulated under these orders.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was conducted by the Subcommittee on Domestic Marketing and Consumer Relations of the House Committee on Agriculture.
  • The primary subject of the hearing was the review of H.R. 13193.
  • The hearing took place during the first session of the 91st Congress.
  • The scope of the hearing included the administrative and operational costs of federal marketing orders.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a marketing order?
A is a federal regulation that helps stabilize market conditions for specific agricultural commodities by setting quality standards and managing supply.
What was the purpose of this hearing?
The purpose was to discuss the costs and regulatory framework associated with s as proposed in H.R. 13193.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Historical focus on marketing order costs

The hearing indicates that the financial burden of federal marketing orders was a subject of legislative scrutiny as early as 1969.

Connected Entities

Ninety-first Congress, Agriculture Committee, Subcommittee on Domestic Marketing and Consumer Relations
otherNinety-first Congress“The legislative session during which the hearing occurred.”Map →
OrganizationAgriculture Committee“The parent committee overseeing the subcommittee.”Map →
OrganizationSubcommittee on Domestic Marketing and Consumer Relations“The congressional body conducting the hearing.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record