Supporting Youth Opportunity and Preventing Delinquency Act of 2016
December 7, 2016
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Currently IN_COMMITTEE. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
The bill changes how federal funding is allocated to states and tribes for juvenile justice, requiring them to meet specific ''—such as sight and sound separation from adult inmates—or face significant funding reductions.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
State and local governments
Must comply with new core requirements and reporting standards to maintain federal grant eligibility.
Indian tribes
Eligible for competitive grants for delinquency prevention and response programs.
Juvenile justice system personnel
Subject to new training requirements regarding evidence-based practices and behavior management.
Adjudicated youth
Impacted by new policies regarding educational credit transfers, restraint usage, and mental health screening.
Current stage: IN_COMMITTEE.
Floor Vote.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if a state fails to meet the 'core requirements'?
Does this bill affect how juveniles are treated in adult jails?
Are there new protections for pregnant youth in custody?
Why It Matters
The bill changes how federal funding is allocated to states and tribes for juvenile justice, requiring them to meet specific ''—such as sight and sound separation from adult inmates—or face significant funding reductions.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Shift toward evidence-based mandates
The bill consistently replaces 'may' with 'shall' regarding the development of evidence-based programs, signaling a move toward mandatory rather than optional implementation of research-backed practices.
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools