The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Senate Hearing on the International Biological Program (1970)
Record date · July 20, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This document is a transcript of a 1970 Senate hearing regarding 89 and H.J. Res. 589. The hearing focused on the federal government's participation and support for the International Biological Program.
The hearing established the legislative record for federal involvement in a large-scale international scientific research initiative.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Scientific research community
The program provided a framework for international collaboration and potential federal funding for biological research projects.
Federal government
The government was determining whether to formally endorse and provide financial support for the international research initiative.
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on February 9, 1970, by the Senate Subcommittee on Health.
- The primary purpose was to discuss S.J. Res. 89 and H.J. Res. 589.
- The subject matter concerns the International Biological Program (IBP).
- The hearing took place during the Ninety-first Congress, second session.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the International Biological Program?
What was the goal of this hearing?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
International Scientific Cooperation
The hearing highlights the transition toward formalizing international scientific cooperation through federal legislative resolutions in the early 1970s.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
