POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Oversight Hearing on Agency Rule-Making Compliance

Original title: RULEMAKERS MUST FOLLOW THE RULES, TOO: OVERSIGHT OF AGENCY COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW ACT

January 1, 2018

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing addresses the legal requirement for federal agencies to submit new rules to Congress before they take effect, which determines the validity and enforceability of federal regulations affecting residents and businesses.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Federal Agencies

Agencies are subject to the reporting requirements of the Congressional Review Act.

Congress

Congress maintains oversight authority to review and potentially block agency rules under the CRA.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2017 House Judiciary hearing regarding whether federal agencies are properly submitting new regulations to Congress as required by the . The hearing focused on oversight of agency compliance with these mandatory reporting rules.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on September 28, 2017, by the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial and Antitrust Law.
  • The Congressional Review Act (CRA) mandates that federal agencies must submit new rules to Congress before they can take effect.
  • The Subcommittee investigated reports that federal agencies have failed to comply with the CRA submission requirement.
  • The hearing included testimony from legal experts and representatives from the Pacific Legal Foundation and the Virginia Cattlemens Association.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Congressional Review Act?
It is a federal law that requires agencies to submit new rules to Congress for review before those rules can officially take effect.
Why was this hearing held?
The held the hearing to conduct oversight on whether federal agencies are following the law by submitting their rules to Congress as required.

Why It Matters

The hearing addresses the legal requirement for federal agencies to submit new rules to Congress before they take effect, which determines the validity and enforceability of federal regulations affecting residents and businesses.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on CRA Compliance

The hearing highlights a specific legislative effort to enforce stricter adherence to the Congressional Review Act by executive agencies.

Connected Entities

otherCongressional Review ActThe federal law requiring agencies to submit new rules to Congress.Map →
personTodd F. GazianoWitness, Executive Director of the Pacific Legal Foundation DC Center.Map →
personDavid CicillineRanking Member of the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial and AntitrusMap →
personJason H. CarterWitness, Executive Director of the Virginia Cattlemens Association.Map →
personRena SteinzorWitness, Professor of Law at the University of Maryland.Map →
personPaul J. Larkin Jr.Witness, Senior Legal Research Fellow at The Heritage Foundation.Map →
personDarrell IssaChairman of the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet,Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record